Restitutio in integrum and unjustified enrichment

Hector MacQueen

doi:10.3366/elr.2023.0828

Restitutio in integrum and unjustified enrichment

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate

Abstract

Case note discussing Lindsay's Executor v Outlook Finance Ltd [2021] CSOH 82 and concluding that the law of restitutio in integrum needs authoritative clarification by the courts.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	192-196
Number of pages	5
Journal	Edinburgh Law Review
Volume	27
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.3366/elr.2023.0828
Publication status	Published - 31 May 2023

Access to Document

10.3366/elr.2023.0828

Cite this

@article{586fef5c13574524b9f2cf7ba92ad254,

title = "Restitutio in integrum and unjustified enrichment",

abstract = "Case note discussing Lindsay's Executor v Outlook Finance Ltd [2021] CSOH 82 and concluding that the law of restitutio in integrum needs authoritative clarification by the courts.",

author = "Hector MacQueen",

year = "2023",

month = may,

day = "31",

doi = "10.3366/elr.2023.0828",

language = "English",

volume = "27",

pages = "192--196",

journal = "Edinburgh Law Review",

issn = "1364-9809",

publisher = "Edinburgh University Press",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Restitutio in integrum and unjustified enrichment

AU - MacQueen, Hector

PY - 2023/5/31

Y1 - 2023/5/31

N2 - Case note discussing Lindsay's Executor v Outlook Finance Ltd [2021] CSOH 82 and concluding that the law of restitutio in integrum needs authoritative clarification by the courts.

AB - Case note discussing Lindsay's Executor v Outlook Finance Ltd [2021] CSOH 82 and concluding that the law of restitutio in integrum needs authoritative clarification by the courts.

U2 - 10.3366/elr.2023.0828

DO - 10.3366/elr.2023.0828

M3 - Comment/debate

SN - 1364-9809

VL - 27

SP - 192

EP - 196

JO - Edinburgh Law Review

JF - Edinburgh Law Review

IS - 2

ER -

Restitutio in integrum and unjustified enrichment

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this