Restitution following Termination of Contract: A Contractual or Enrichment Remedy?

Martin Hogg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This article examines whether, when a contract is terminated, the entitlement to restitution of sums paid in advance in respect of which reciprocal performance was not received lies in contract or unjustified enrichment. The discussion is focused on the judgment of Stork Technical Services (Ltd) v Ross [2015] CSOH 10A.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)269-273
Number of pages5
JournalEdinburgh Law Review
Volume19
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2015

Keywords

  • law
  • Contract law
  • Restitution
  • restitution unjustified enrichment

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Restitution following Termination of Contract: A Contractual or Enrichment Remedy?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this