TY - JOUR
T1 - Retrofitting hollow fibre carbon capture systems to decarbonise surface transport
AU - Larkin, Collette
AU - Lampri, Kyriaki
AU - Mazzone, Simona
AU - Oliva, Fermín
AU - Kang, Li
AU - Garcia Garcia, Francisco
N1 - Funding Information:
C. Larkin gratefully acknowledges the funding provided by the School of Engineering at the University of Edinburgh and Repsol S.A. to carry out her PhD ( EP/T517884/1 ). Likewise, K. Lampri gratefully acknowledges the funding provided by the School of Engineering at the University of Edinburgh during her Summer Vacation Internship at the Denbigh Lab in Jun–Aug 2021. This work has also been supported by Net Zero Technology Centre (NZTC 2175 SPARK).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors.
PY - 2023/1
Y1 - 2023/1
N2 - On-board carbon capture and storage (CCS) is being recognised as an essential transitional solution for transport decarbonisation. However, due to inherent space constraints, retrofitting current CCS technology to vehicles is challenging. Herein, the feasibility of a novel hollow fibre carbon capture system impregnated with a carbon xerogel for on-board CCS was assessed. The working capacity of four carbon xerogels with varying surface area/surface groups, over ten temperature swing adsorption (TSA) cycles, was studied in a packed bed adsorption unit (PBAU). The highest-performing carbon xerogel (i.e. CX) was deposited inside a hollow fibre support to form the hollow fibre adsorption unit (HFAU). Under typical vehicle exhaust gas compositions (i.e. 14 vol% CO2 + 3 vol% H2O balanced in air) and at mild operating conditions (i.e. adsorption at 25 °C, 1 atm; desorption at 125 °C, 1 atm), the HFAU exhibited a 1.3 times greater working capacity than the equivalent PBAU (i.e. 4.7 mmol g−1 and 3.5 mmol g−1, respectively), due to minimized mass transfer limitations. In addition, the results obtained were used in a study that compared hollow fibre carbon capture systems and packed bed carbon capture systems designed to be retrofitted to three transport scenarios: (1) a light-duty vehicle (car/van); (2) a large regional delivery truck; and, (3) a ferry. For scenarios 2 and 3, the findings of the study showcased the potential of retrofitting a hollow fibre carbon capture system to these large surface transport modes. However, for scenario 1, despite obtaining a hollow fibre carbon capture system that was 3.5 times smaller, 5.7 times lighter and 6.6 times cheaper than the packed bed carbon capture system, it cannot be feasibly retrofitted without significant improvements in weight. Furthermore, a short-hand simplified heat exchange approach was presented to obtain the TSA operation temperatures of the carbon capture systems.
AB - On-board carbon capture and storage (CCS) is being recognised as an essential transitional solution for transport decarbonisation. However, due to inherent space constraints, retrofitting current CCS technology to vehicles is challenging. Herein, the feasibility of a novel hollow fibre carbon capture system impregnated with a carbon xerogel for on-board CCS was assessed. The working capacity of four carbon xerogels with varying surface area/surface groups, over ten temperature swing adsorption (TSA) cycles, was studied in a packed bed adsorption unit (PBAU). The highest-performing carbon xerogel (i.e. CX) was deposited inside a hollow fibre support to form the hollow fibre adsorption unit (HFAU). Under typical vehicle exhaust gas compositions (i.e. 14 vol% CO2 + 3 vol% H2O balanced in air) and at mild operating conditions (i.e. adsorption at 25 °C, 1 atm; desorption at 125 °C, 1 atm), the HFAU exhibited a 1.3 times greater working capacity than the equivalent PBAU (i.e. 4.7 mmol g−1 and 3.5 mmol g−1, respectively), due to minimized mass transfer limitations. In addition, the results obtained were used in a study that compared hollow fibre carbon capture systems and packed bed carbon capture systems designed to be retrofitted to three transport scenarios: (1) a light-duty vehicle (car/van); (2) a large regional delivery truck; and, (3) a ferry. For scenarios 2 and 3, the findings of the study showcased the potential of retrofitting a hollow fibre carbon capture system to these large surface transport modes. However, for scenario 1, despite obtaining a hollow fibre carbon capture system that was 3.5 times smaller, 5.7 times lighter and 6.6 times cheaper than the packed bed carbon capture system, it cannot be feasibly retrofitted without significant improvements in weight. Furthermore, a short-hand simplified heat exchange approach was presented to obtain the TSA operation temperatures of the carbon capture systems.
U2 - 10.1016/j.jcou.2022.102336
DO - 10.1016/j.jcou.2022.102336
M3 - Article
SN - 2212-9820
VL - 67
JO - Journal of CO2 Utilization
JF - Journal of CO2 Utilization
M1 - 102336
ER -