Revision of the ARRIVE guidelines: Rationale and scope

Nathalie Percie Du Sert; Viki Hurst; Amrita Ahluwalia; Sabina Alam; Douglas G. Altman; Marc T. Avey; Monya Baker; William Browne; Alejandra Clark; Innes C. Cuthill; Ulrich Dirnagl; Michael Emerson; Paul Garner; David W. Howells; Natasha A. Karp; Catriona J. MacCallum; Malcolm MacLeod; Ole Petersen; Frances Rawle; Penny Reynolds; Kieron Rooney; Emily S. Sena; Shai D. Silberberg; Thomas Steckler; Hanno Würbel; Stephen T. Holgate

doi:10.1136/bmjos-2018-000002

Revision of the ARRIVE guidelines: Rationale and scope

Nathalie Percie Du Sert^*, Viki Hurst, Amrita Ahluwalia, Sabina Alam, Douglas G. Altman, Marc T. Avey, Monya Baker, William Browne, Alejandra Clark, Innes C. Cuthill, Ulrich Dirnagl, Michael Emerson, Paul Garner, David W. Howells, Natasha A. Karp, Catriona J. MacCallum, Malcolm MacLeod, Ole Petersen, Frances Rawle, Penny ReynoldsKieron Rooney, Emily S. Sena, Shai D. Silberberg, Thomas Steckler, Hanno Würbel, Stephen T. Holgate

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

Abstract / Description of output

In 2010, the NC3Rs published the Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments (ARRIVE) guidelines to improve the reporting of animal research. Despite considerable levels of support from the scientific community, the impact on the quality of reporting in animal research publications has been limited. This position paper highlights the strategy of an expert working group established to revise the guidelines and facilitate their uptake. The group's initial work will focus on three main areas: prioritisation of the ARRIVE items into a tiered system, development of an explanation and elaboration document, and revision of specific items.

Original language	English
Article number	e000002
Journal	BMJ Open Science
Volume	2
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjos-2018-000002
Publication status	Published - 19 Oct 2018

Access to Document

10.1136/bmjos-2018-000002Licence: Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY)

Revision of the ARRIVE guidelines rationale and scopeFinal published version, 520 KBLicence: Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY)

Cite this

Percie Du Sert, N., Hurst, V., Ahluwalia, A., Alam, S., Altman, D. G., Avey, M. T., Baker, M., Browne, W., Clark, A., Cuthill, I. C., Dirnagl, U., Emerson, M., Garner, P., Howells, D. W., Karp, N. A., MacCallum, C. J., MacLeod, M., Petersen, O., Rawle, F., ... Holgate, S. T. (2018). Revision of the ARRIVE guidelines: Rationale and scope. BMJ Open Science, 2(1), Article e000002. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjos-2018-000002

@article{7921c7504dfe4ed7a8072b24fedf01ab,

title = "Revision of the ARRIVE guidelines: Rationale and scope",

abstract = "In 2010, the NC3Rs published the Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments (ARRIVE) guidelines to improve the reporting of animal research. Despite considerable levels of support from the scientific community, the impact on the quality of reporting in animal research publications has been limited. This position paper highlights the strategy of an expert working group established to revise the guidelines and facilitate their uptake. The group's initial work will focus on three main areas: prioritisation of the ARRIVE items into a tiered system, development of an explanation and elaboration document, and revision of specific items.",

author = "{Percie Du Sert}, Nathalie and Viki Hurst and Amrita Ahluwalia and Sabina Alam and Altman, {Douglas G.} and Avey, {Marc T.} and Monya Baker and William Browne and Alejandra Clark and Cuthill, {Innes C.} and Ulrich Dirnagl and Michael Emerson and Paul Garner and Howells, {David W.} and Karp, {Natasha A.} and MacCallum, {Catriona J.} and Malcolm MacLeod and Ole Petersen and Frances Rawle and Penny Reynolds and Kieron Rooney and Sena, {Emily S.} and Silberberg, {Shai D.} and Thomas Steckler and Hanno W{\"u}rbel and Holgate, {Stephen T.}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC-BY. Published by BMJ.",

year = "2018",

month = oct,

day = "19",

doi = "10.1136/bmjos-2018-000002",

language = "English",

volume = "2",

journal = "BMJ Open Science",

issn = "2398-8703",

publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",

number = "1",

}

Percie Du Sert, N, Hurst, V, Ahluwalia, A, Alam, S, Altman, DG, Avey, MT, Baker, M, Browne, W, Clark, A, Cuthill, IC, Dirnagl, U, Emerson, M, Garner, P, Howells, DW, Karp, NA, MacCallum, CJ, MacLeod, M, Petersen, O, Rawle, F, Reynolds, P, Rooney, K, Sena, ES, Silberberg, SD, Steckler, T, Würbel, H & Holgate, ST 2018, 'Revision of the ARRIVE guidelines: Rationale and scope', BMJ Open Science, vol. 2, no. 1, e000002. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjos-2018-000002

TY - JOUR

T1 - Revision of the ARRIVE guidelines

T2 - Rationale and scope

AU - Percie Du Sert, Nathalie

AU - Hurst, Viki

AU - Ahluwalia, Amrita

AU - Alam, Sabina

AU - Altman, Douglas G.

AU - Avey, Marc T.

AU - Baker, Monya

AU - Browne, William

AU - Clark, Alejandra

AU - Cuthill, Innes C.

AU - Dirnagl, Ulrich

AU - Emerson, Michael

AU - Garner, Paul

AU - Howells, David W.

AU - Karp, Natasha A.

AU - MacCallum, Catriona J.

AU - MacLeod, Malcolm

AU - Petersen, Ole

AU - Rawle, Frances

AU - Reynolds, Penny

AU - Rooney, Kieron

AU - Sena, Emily S.

AU - Silberberg, Shai D.

AU - Steckler, Thomas

AU - Würbel, Hanno

AU - Holgate, Stephen T.

PY - 2018/10/19

Y1 - 2018/10/19

N2 - In 2010, the NC3Rs published the Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments (ARRIVE) guidelines to improve the reporting of animal research. Despite considerable levels of support from the scientific community, the impact on the quality of reporting in animal research publications has been limited. This position paper highlights the strategy of an expert working group established to revise the guidelines and facilitate their uptake. The group's initial work will focus on three main areas: prioritisation of the ARRIVE items into a tiered system, development of an explanation and elaboration document, and revision of specific items.

AB - In 2010, the NC3Rs published the Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments (ARRIVE) guidelines to improve the reporting of animal research. Despite considerable levels of support from the scientific community, the impact on the quality of reporting in animal research publications has been limited. This position paper highlights the strategy of an expert working group established to revise the guidelines and facilitate their uptake. The group's initial work will focus on three main areas: prioritisation of the ARRIVE items into a tiered system, development of an explanation and elaboration document, and revision of specific items.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058515198&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/bmjos-2018-000002

DO - 10.1136/bmjos-2018-000002

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85058515198

SN - 2398-8703

VL - 2

JO - BMJ Open Science

JF - BMJ Open Science

IS - 1

M1 - e000002

ER -

Revision of the ARRIVE guidelines: Rationale and scope

Abstract / Description of output

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this