Projects per year
Abstract / Description of output
This paper evaluates two commonly accepted Raman lineshape models typically
used to fit CARS theory to data; the Modified Exponential Gap (MEG)
and the Energy Corrected Sudden (ECS) models. The adjustable parameters
in each model have been fit to published experimental linewidths, and
comparisons are made to the various publications that have already provided
similar adjustable constants. The approaches presented in the literature are
discussed as are differences with the findings presented here.
used to fit CARS theory to data; the Modified Exponential Gap (MEG)
and the Energy Corrected Sudden (ECS) models. The adjustable parameters
in each model have been fit to published experimental linewidths, and
comparisons are made to the various publications that have already provided
similar adjustable constants. The approaches presented in the literature are
discussed as are differences with the findings presented here.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 111928 |
Journal | Combustion and Flame |
Volume | 243 |
Early online date | 20 Dec 2021 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 20 Dec 2021 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Revisiting N2-N2 collisional linewidth models for S-branch rotational Raman scattering'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Projects
- 1 Finished
-
Energy transfer Processes at gas/wall Interfaces under extreme Conditions
1/12/17 → 31/05/23
Project: Research