@article{40e7057760164a8c82e1b3b56578478b,
title = "Risky belief",
abstract = "In this paper I defend the claim that justification is closed under conjunction, and confront its most alarming consequence – that one can have justification for believing propositions that are unlikely to be true, given one{\textquoteright}s evidence.",
keywords = "belief, conjunction closure, justification, risk aggregation, single premise closure",
author = "Martin Smith",
note = "Funding Information: This paper was presented (online) at the COGITO Epistemology Mini‐Workshop in January 2021, at the Goethe University Philosophy Colloquium in May 2021 and at the Oxford Epistemology Group in November 2021. Thanks to all of those who participated on these occasions. Particular thanks to Dominik Kauss, for extensive comments on an earlier draft, and to an anonymous referee for this journal. Work on this paper was supported by the Arts and Humanities Research Council (Grant Number AH/T002638/1). Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 The Authors. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Philosophy and Phenonmenological Research Inc.",
year = "2022",
month = jun,
day = "27",
doi = "10.1111/phpr.12894",
language = "English",
journal = "Philosophy and Phenomenological Research",
issn = "0031-8205",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
}