TY - JOUR
T1 - Rituximab versus tocilizumab in rheumatoid arthritis
T2 - synovial biopsy-based biomarker analysis of the phase 4 R4RA randomized trial
AU - R4RA collaborative group
AU - Rivellese, Felice
AU - Surace, Anna E A
AU - Goldmann, Katriona
AU - Sciacca, Elisabetta
AU - Çubuk, Cankut
AU - Giorli, Giovanni
AU - John, Christopher R
AU - Nerviani, Alessandra
AU - Fossati-Jimack, Liliane
AU - Thorborn, Georgina
AU - Ahmed, Manzoor
AU - Prediletto, Edoardo
AU - Church, Sarah E
AU - Hudson, Briana M
AU - Warren, Sarah E
AU - McKeigue, Paul M
AU - Humby, Frances
AU - Bombardieri, Michele
AU - Barnes, Michael R
AU - Lewis, Myles J
AU - Pitzalis, Costantino
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank all patients participating in the trial for their generous contribution of time, patience and willingness to consent to a minimally invasive procedure that they would not have had as part of their routine care; and the Patient Advisory Group, represented by Z. Ide, for their continuous support in evaluation of trial documentation and the linked research, as well as in dissemination of the importance of precision medicine among patients and through patient organizations (including the National Rheumatoid Arthritis Society).The R4RA trial was funded by the Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation (EME) Programme, a partnership between the Medical Research Council (MRC) and the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) (grant no. 11/100/76). This study was further supported by NIHR (grant 131575) and MRC (MR/V012509/1). We would also like to thank the NIHR for supporting F.R.’s fellowship (no. TRF-2018-11-ST2-002), and Versus Arthritis for providing infrastructure support through the Experimental Arthritis Treatment Centre (grant no. 20022) and for supporting A.N.’s clinical lectureship (grant no. 21890). The views and opinions expressed by authors in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the NHS, the NIHR, MRC, Versus Arthritis or the Department of Health. We thank A. Spiliopoulou (Edinburgh University) for statistical advice and discussions. Some of the illustrations were created using Servier medical art (smart.servier.com) under Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, Crown.
PY - 2022/6
Y1 - 2022/6
N2 - Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) receive highly targeted biologic therapies without previous knowledge of target expression levels in the diseased tissue. Approximately 40% of patients do not respond to individual biologic therapies and 5-20% are refractory to all. In a biopsy-based, precision-medicine, randomized clinical trial in RA (R4RA; n = 164), patients with low/absent synovial B cell molecular signature had a lower response to rituximab (anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody) compared with that to tocilizumab (anti-IL6R monoclonal antibody) although the exact mechanisms of response/nonresponse remain to be established. Here, in-depth histological/molecular analyses of R4RA synovial biopsies identify humoral immune response gene signatures associated with response to rituximab and tocilizumab, and a stromal/fibroblast signature in patients refractory to all medications. Post-treatment changes in synovial gene expression and cell infiltration highlighted divergent effects of rituximab and tocilizumab relating to differing response/nonresponse mechanisms. Using ten-by-tenfold nested cross-validation, we developed machine learning algorithms predictive of response to rituximab (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.74), tocilizumab (AUC = 0.68) and, notably, multidrug resistance (AUC = 0.69). This study supports the notion that disease endotypes, driven by diverse molecular pathology pathways in the diseased tissue, determine diverse clinical and treatment-response phenotypes. It also highlights the importance of integration of molecular pathology signatures into clinical algorithms to optimize the future use of existing medications and inform the development of new drugs for refractory patients.
AB - Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) receive highly targeted biologic therapies without previous knowledge of target expression levels in the diseased tissue. Approximately 40% of patients do not respond to individual biologic therapies and 5-20% are refractory to all. In a biopsy-based, precision-medicine, randomized clinical trial in RA (R4RA; n = 164), patients with low/absent synovial B cell molecular signature had a lower response to rituximab (anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody) compared with that to tocilizumab (anti-IL6R monoclonal antibody) although the exact mechanisms of response/nonresponse remain to be established. Here, in-depth histological/molecular analyses of R4RA synovial biopsies identify humoral immune response gene signatures associated with response to rituximab and tocilizumab, and a stromal/fibroblast signature in patients refractory to all medications. Post-treatment changes in synovial gene expression and cell infiltration highlighted divergent effects of rituximab and tocilizumab relating to differing response/nonresponse mechanisms. Using ten-by-tenfold nested cross-validation, we developed machine learning algorithms predictive of response to rituximab (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.74), tocilizumab (AUC = 0.68) and, notably, multidrug resistance (AUC = 0.69). This study supports the notion that disease endotypes, driven by diverse molecular pathology pathways in the diseased tissue, determine diverse clinical and treatment-response phenotypes. It also highlights the importance of integration of molecular pathology signatures into clinical algorithms to optimize the future use of existing medications and inform the development of new drugs for refractory patients.
U2 - 10.1038/s41591-022-01789-0
DO - 10.1038/s41591-022-01789-0
M3 - Article
C2 - 35589854
SN - 1078-8956
VL - 28
SP - 1256
EP - 1268
JO - Nature Medicine
JF - Nature Medicine
IS - 6
ER -