Abstract
Feminists have spent decades trying to reform laws and evidential procedures relating to sexual assault. Using the current Scottish context as a case study, I will argue in this article that while efforts to reform the text of the substantive as well as evidential and procedural aspects of the law have been largely successful, in practice the impact of these reforms has not always been felt. Drawing on contemporary examples from Scotland, and contextualizing these against the broader context of similar problems and arguments in other jurisdictions such as England and Wales, and Canada, I will examine the ways in which the ‘laws on the books’ have not always translated smoothly through to ‘law in action’. Ultimately, I argue that our all too frequent failures to punish sexual violence in a meaningful way suggests that we need to think again about how we deal with issues of sexual violence in contemporary society.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 22-51 |
Number of pages | 30 |
Journal | Edinburgh Law Review |
Volume | 23 |
Issue number | 1 |
Early online date | 1 Jan 2019 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 2019 |
Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)
- sexual violence
- rape myths
- Scotland
- criminal law
- evidence
- judgments
- sexual assault
- rape
- law reform
- law in action
- feminism
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Sense and sensibilities: A feminist critique of legal interventions against sexual violence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Profiles
-
Sharon Cowan
- School of Law - Personal Chair of Feminist and Queer Legal Studies
- Edinburgh Centre for Legal Theory
Person: Academic: Research Active