Sense and sensibilities: A feminist critique of legal interventions against sexual violence

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Feminists have spent decades trying to reform laws and evidential procedures relating to sexual assault. Using the current Scottish context as a case study, I will argue in this article that while efforts to reform the text of the substantive as well as evidential and procedural aspects of the law have been largely successful, in practice the impact of these reforms has not always been felt. Drawing on contemporary examples from Scotland, and contextualizing these against the broader context of similar problems and arguments in other jurisdictions such as England and Wales, and Canada, I will examine the ways in which the ‘laws on the books’ have not always translated smoothly through to ‘law in action’. Ultimately, I argue that our all too frequent failures to punish sexual violence in a meaningful way suggests that we need to think again about how we deal with issues of sexual violence in contemporary society.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)22-51
Number of pages30
JournalEdinburgh Law Review
Volume23
Issue number1
Early online date1 Jan 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2019

Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)

  • sexual violence
  • rape myths
  • Scotland
  • criminal law
  • evidence
  • judgments
  • sexual assault
  • rape
  • law reform
  • law in action
  • feminism

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Sense and sensibilities: A feminist critique of legal interventions against sexual violence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this