Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Setting the Standard for Routine Asthma Consultations: A Discussion of the Aims, Process and Outcomes of Reviewing People with Asthma in Primary Care

  • H. Pinnock
  • , M. Fletcher
  • , S. Holmes
  • , D. Keeley
  • , J. Leyshone
  • , D. Price
  • , R. Russell
  • , J. Versnel
  • , B. Wagstaff

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Globally, asthma morbidity remains unacceptably high. If outcomes are to be improved, it is crucial that routine review consultations in primary care are performed to a high standard. Key components of a review include: • Assessment of control using specific morbidity questions to elucidate the presence of symptoms, in conjunction with the frequency of use of short-acting bronchodilators and any recent history of acute attacks • After consideration of the diagnosis, and an assessment of compliance, inhaler technique, smoking status, triggers, and rhinitis, identification of poor control should result in a step-up of treatment in accordance with evidence-based guideline recommendations • Discussion should address understanding of the condition, patient-centred management goals and attitudes to regular treatment, and should include personalised self-management education Regular review of people with asthma coupled with provision of self-management education improves outcomes. Underpinned by a theoretical framework integrating professional reviews and patient self-care we discuss the practical barriers to implementing guided selfmanagement in routine clinical practice.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)75-83
Number of pages9
JournalPrimary Care Respiratory Journal
Volume19
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2010

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Setting the Standard for Routine Asthma Consultations: A Discussion of the Aims, Process and Outcomes of Reviewing People with Asthma in Primary Care'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this