TY - JOUR
T1 - Severe COVID-19 outcomes after full vaccination of primary schedule and initial boosters
T2 - pooled analysis of national prospective cohort studies of 30 million individuals in England, Northern Ireland, Scotland, and Wales
AU - Agrawal, Utkarsh
AU - Bedston, Stuart
AU - McCowan, Colin
AU - Oke, Jason
AU - Patterson, Lynsey
AU - Robertson, Chris
AU - Akbari, Ashley
AU - Azcoaga-Lorenzo, Amaya
AU - Bradley, Declan T
AU - Fagbamigbe, Adeniyi Francis
AU - Grange, Zoe
AU - Hall, Elliott C R
AU - Joy, Mark
AU - Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal
AU - Kerr, Steven
AU - Ritchie, Lewis
AU - Murphy, Siobhán
AU - Owen, Rhiannon K
AU - Rudan, Igor
AU - Shah, Syed Ahmar
AU - Simpson, Colin R
AU - Torabi, Fatemeh
AU - Tsang, Ruby S M
AU - de Lusignan, Simon
AU - Lyons, Ronan A
AU - O'Reilly, Dermot
AU - Sheikh, Aziz
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was funded by the National Core Studies–Immunity group. This research is part of the Data and Connectivity National Core Study, led by Health Data Research UK in partnership with the Office for National Statistics and funded by UK Research and Innovation (grant ref MC_PC_20060), with support from the DaC-VaP-2 study also funded by UK Research and Innovation (grant ref MC_PC_20058). The study entitled “Use of national linked health care, serological data, and viral genomic data to identify and characterise post-third and -booster dose vaccine breakthroughs at a population level” is a partnership between the University of Edinburgh, Swansea University, Oxford University, Queen's University of Belfast, University of St Andrews, and The Office for National Statistics. The authors would like to acknowledge all other project collaborators not involved in these analyses but who are contributing to wider discussions and preceding outputs. EAVE II is funded by the Medical Research Council (MR/R008345/1) with the support of BREATHE–The Health Data Research Hub for Respiratory Health (MC_PC_19004), which is funded through the UK Research and Innovation Industrial Strategy Challenge Fund and is delivered through Health Data Research UK. Additional support has been provided through Public Health Scotland and Scottish Government Director-General Health and Social Care. We thank Dave Kelly from Albasoft for his support with making primary care data available, and James Pickett, Wendy Inglis-Humphrey, Vicky Hammersley, Maria Georgiou, Laura Gonzalez Rienda, Pam McVeigh, Amanda Burridge, Sumedha Asnani-Chetal, and Afshin Dastafshan for their support with project management and administration. We acknowledge the support of the EAVE II Patient Advisory Group. We thank the patients and practice of the Research and Surveillance Centre who allow data sharing, and EMIS, TPP, Cegedim, and Wellbeing for help with pseudonymised data extraction. Rachel Byford and the ORCHID data team extracted these data, and Sneha N Anand project managed. We also acknowledge the help from Paul Moss and Samantha Lycett for in answering the reviews. The authors would like to acknowledge the help provided by the staff of the Honest Broker Service within the Business Services Organisation Northern Ireland (BSO). The Honest Broker Service is funded by the BSO and the Department of Health for Northern Ireland. The authors alone are responsible for the interpretation of the data and any views or opinions presented are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of the BSO.
Funding Information:
AS and CR are members of the Scottish Government Chief Medical Officer's COVID-19 Advisory Group. AS is a member of the Scottish Government's Standing Committee on Pandemic Preparedness, the UK Government's New and Emerging Respiratory Virus Threats Advisory Group (known as NERVTAG) Risk Stratification Subgroup, the Department of Health and Social Care's COVID-19 Therapeutics Modelling Group, and was a member of AstraZeneca's COVID-19 Strategic Thrombocytopenia Taskforce. All AS's roles are unfunded. CMC reports research funding from the Medical Research Council, Health Data Research UK, the National Institute for Health and Care Research, and the Scottish Chief Scientist Office. SVK was Co-Chair of the Scottish Government's Expert Reference Group on COVID-19 and ethnicity and is a member of the SAGE subgroup on ethnicity. SVK acknowledges funding from an NRS Senior Clinical Fellowship (SCAF/15/02), the Medical Research Council (MC_UU_00022/2), and the Scottish Government Chief Scientist Office (SPHSU17). CR is a member of the Scientific Pandemic Influenza Group on Modelling, Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency Vaccine Benefit and Risk Working Group. SdL received funding through his university for vaccine-related research from AstraZeneca, GSK, Sanofi, Seqirus, and Takeda. He has been a member of advisory boards for AstraZeneca, Sanofi, and Seqirus, and is Director of the Research and Surveillance Centre. All other authors declare no competing interests.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license
PY - 2022/10/15
Y1 - 2022/10/15
N2 - BACKGROUND: Current UK vaccination policy is to offer future COVID-19 booster doses to individuals at high risk of serious illness from COVID-19, but it is still uncertain which groups of the population could benefit most. In response to an urgent request from the UK Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation, we aimed to identify risk factors for severe COVID-19 outcomes (ie, COVID-19-related hospitalisation or death) in individuals who had completed their primary COVID-19 vaccination schedule and had received the first booster vaccine.METHODS: We constructed prospective cohorts across all four UK nations through linkages of primary care, RT-PCR testing, vaccination, hospitalisation, and mortality data on 30 million people. We included individuals who received primary vaccine doses of BNT162b2 (tozinameran; Pfizer-BioNTech) or ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (Oxford-AstraZeneca) vaccines in our initial analyses. We then restricted analyses to those given a BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 (elasomeran; Moderna) booster and had a severe COVID-19 outcome between Dec 20, 2021, and Feb 28, 2022 (when the omicron (B.1.1.529) variant was dominant). We fitted time-dependent Poisson regression models and calculated adjusted rate ratios (aRRs) and 95% CIs for the associations between risk factors and COVID-19-related hospitalisation or death. We adjusted for a range of potential covariates, including age, sex, comorbidities, and previous SARS-CoV-2 infection. Stratified analyses were conducted by vaccine type. We then did pooled analyses across UK nations using fixed-effect meta-analyses.FINDINGS: Between Dec 8, 2020, and Feb 28, 2022, 16 208 600 individuals completed their primary vaccine schedule and 13 836 390 individuals received a booster dose. Between Dec 20, 2021, and Feb 28, 2022, 59 510 (0·4%) of the primary vaccine group and 26 100 (0·2%) of those who received their booster had severe COVID-19 outcomes. The risk of severe COVID-19 outcomes reduced after receiving the booster (rate change: 8·8 events per 1000 person-years to 7·6 events per 1000 person-years). Older adults (≥80 years vs 18-49 years; aRR 3·60 [95% CI 3·45-3·75]), those with comorbidities (≥5 comorbidities vs none; 9·51 [9·07-9·97]), being male (male vs female; 1·23 [1·20-1·26]), and those with certain underlying health conditions-in particular, individuals receiving immunosuppressants (yes vs no; 5·80 [5·53-6·09])-and those with chronic kidney disease (stage 5 vs no; 3·71 [2·90-4·74]) remained at high risk despite the initial booster. Individuals with a history of COVID-19 infection were at reduced risk (infected ≥9 months before booster dose vs no previous infection; aRR 0·41 [95% CI 0·29-0·58]).INTERPRETATION: Older people, those with multimorbidity, and those with specific underlying health conditions remain at increased risk of COVID-19 hospitalisation and death after the initial vaccine booster and should, therefore, be prioritised for additional boosters, including novel optimised versions, and the increasing array of COVID-19 therapeutics.FUNDING: National Core Studies-Immunity, UK Research and Innovation (Medical Research Council), Health Data Research UK, the Scottish Government, and the University of Edinburgh.
AB - BACKGROUND: Current UK vaccination policy is to offer future COVID-19 booster doses to individuals at high risk of serious illness from COVID-19, but it is still uncertain which groups of the population could benefit most. In response to an urgent request from the UK Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation, we aimed to identify risk factors for severe COVID-19 outcomes (ie, COVID-19-related hospitalisation or death) in individuals who had completed their primary COVID-19 vaccination schedule and had received the first booster vaccine.METHODS: We constructed prospective cohorts across all four UK nations through linkages of primary care, RT-PCR testing, vaccination, hospitalisation, and mortality data on 30 million people. We included individuals who received primary vaccine doses of BNT162b2 (tozinameran; Pfizer-BioNTech) or ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (Oxford-AstraZeneca) vaccines in our initial analyses. We then restricted analyses to those given a BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 (elasomeran; Moderna) booster and had a severe COVID-19 outcome between Dec 20, 2021, and Feb 28, 2022 (when the omicron (B.1.1.529) variant was dominant). We fitted time-dependent Poisson regression models and calculated adjusted rate ratios (aRRs) and 95% CIs for the associations between risk factors and COVID-19-related hospitalisation or death. We adjusted for a range of potential covariates, including age, sex, comorbidities, and previous SARS-CoV-2 infection. Stratified analyses were conducted by vaccine type. We then did pooled analyses across UK nations using fixed-effect meta-analyses.FINDINGS: Between Dec 8, 2020, and Feb 28, 2022, 16 208 600 individuals completed their primary vaccine schedule and 13 836 390 individuals received a booster dose. Between Dec 20, 2021, and Feb 28, 2022, 59 510 (0·4%) of the primary vaccine group and 26 100 (0·2%) of those who received their booster had severe COVID-19 outcomes. The risk of severe COVID-19 outcomes reduced after receiving the booster (rate change: 8·8 events per 1000 person-years to 7·6 events per 1000 person-years). Older adults (≥80 years vs 18-49 years; aRR 3·60 [95% CI 3·45-3·75]), those with comorbidities (≥5 comorbidities vs none; 9·51 [9·07-9·97]), being male (male vs female; 1·23 [1·20-1·26]), and those with certain underlying health conditions-in particular, individuals receiving immunosuppressants (yes vs no; 5·80 [5·53-6·09])-and those with chronic kidney disease (stage 5 vs no; 3·71 [2·90-4·74]) remained at high risk despite the initial booster. Individuals with a history of COVID-19 infection were at reduced risk (infected ≥9 months before booster dose vs no previous infection; aRR 0·41 [95% CI 0·29-0·58]).INTERPRETATION: Older people, those with multimorbidity, and those with specific underlying health conditions remain at increased risk of COVID-19 hospitalisation and death after the initial vaccine booster and should, therefore, be prioritised for additional boosters, including novel optimised versions, and the increasing array of COVID-19 therapeutics.FUNDING: National Core Studies-Immunity, UK Research and Innovation (Medical Research Council), Health Data Research UK, the Scottish Government, and the University of Edinburgh.
KW - Aged
KW - BNT162 Vaccine
KW - COVID-19/epidemiology
KW - COVID-19 Vaccines
KW - ChAdOx1 nCoV-19
KW - England/epidemiology
KW - Female
KW - Humans
KW - Immunization, Secondary
KW - Immunosuppressive Agents
KW - Male
KW - Northern Ireland
KW - Prospective Studies
KW - SARS-CoV-2
KW - Scotland
KW - Vaccination
KW - Wales/epidemiology
U2 - 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01656-7
DO - 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01656-7
M3 - Article
C2 - 36244382
SN - 0140-6736
VL - 400
SP - 1305
EP - 1320
JO - The Lancet
JF - The Lancet
IS - 10360
ER -