Shape-shifting, sound-change and the genesis of prodigal writing systems

Margaret Laing, Roger Lass

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract / Description of output

In a series of articles we have looked at individual early Middle English writing systems and explored aspects of multivocal sound/symbol and symbol/sound relationships. This article combines previous observations with new material, and provides insights into the genesis of these relations and how they may interconnect. Since many early Middle English texts survive as copies, not originals, they may give clues to the orthographic systems of their exemplars too.

We investigate the 'extensibility' of Litteral and Potestatic Substitution Sets. Writing systems may be economical or prodigal. The 'ideal' economical system would map into a broad phonetic or a phonemic transcription: that is, one 'sound', one symbol. In early Middle English there is no one standard written norm, so there is potentially less restraint on diversity than in standard systems. Further extensibility is built into the system. We show that much of what tends to be dismissed as 'scribal error' rather represents writing praxis no longer familiar to us - flexible matrices of substitution and variation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-31
Number of pages31
JournalEnglish Language and Linguistics
Volume13
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2009

Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)

  • MIDDLE-ENGLISH

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Shape-shifting, sound-change and the genesis of prodigal writing systems'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this