TY - JOUR
T1 - SIDMA as a criterion for psychiatric compulsion
T2 - An analysis of compulsory treatment orders in Scotland
AU - Martin, Wayne
AU - Brown, Miriam
AU - Hartvigsson, Thomas
AU - Lyons, Donny
AU - MacLeod, Callum
AU - Morgan, Graham
AU - Schölin, Lisa
AU - Taylor, Kathleen
AU - Chopra, Arun
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was funded in whole, or in part, by the Wellcome Trust [ 203376/Z/16/Z ]. For the purpose of open access, the author has applied a CC BY public copyright licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising from this submission.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors
PY - 2021/8/24
Y1 - 2021/8/24
N2 - Scottish mental health legislation includes a unique criterion for the use of compulsion in the delivery of mental health care and treatment. Under the Mental Health (Care and Treatment) (Scotland) Act, 2003, patients must exhibit ‘significantly impaired decision-making ability’ (SIDMA) in order to be eligible for psychiatric detention or involuntary psychiatric treatment outside the forensic context. The SIDMA requirement represents a distinctive strategy in ongoing international efforts to rethink the conditions under which psychiatric compulsion is permissible. We reconstruct the history of the Scottish SIDMA requirement, analyse its differences from so-called ‘fusion law,’ and then examine how the SIDMA standard actually functions in practice. We analyse 100 reports that accompany applications for Compulsory Treatment Orders (CTOs). Based on this analysis, we provide a profile of the patient population that is found to exhibit SIDMA, identify the grounds upon which SIDMA is attributed to individual patients, and offer an assessment of the quality of the documentation of SIDMA. We demonstrate that there are systemic areas of poor practice in the reporting of SIDMA, with only 12% of CTOs satisfying the minimum standard of formal completeness endorsed by the Mental Welfare Commission. We consider what lessons might be drawn both for the ongoing review of mental health legislation in Scotland, and for law reform initiatives in other jurisdictions.
AB - Scottish mental health legislation includes a unique criterion for the use of compulsion in the delivery of mental health care and treatment. Under the Mental Health (Care and Treatment) (Scotland) Act, 2003, patients must exhibit ‘significantly impaired decision-making ability’ (SIDMA) in order to be eligible for psychiatric detention or involuntary psychiatric treatment outside the forensic context. The SIDMA requirement represents a distinctive strategy in ongoing international efforts to rethink the conditions under which psychiatric compulsion is permissible. We reconstruct the history of the Scottish SIDMA requirement, analyse its differences from so-called ‘fusion law,’ and then examine how the SIDMA standard actually functions in practice. We analyse 100 reports that accompany applications for Compulsory Treatment Orders (CTOs). Based on this analysis, we provide a profile of the patient population that is found to exhibit SIDMA, identify the grounds upon which SIDMA is attributed to individual patients, and offer an assessment of the quality of the documentation of SIDMA. We demonstrate that there are systemic areas of poor practice in the reporting of SIDMA, with only 12% of CTOs satisfying the minimum standard of formal completeness endorsed by the Mental Welfare Commission. We consider what lessons might be drawn both for the ongoing review of mental health legislation in Scotland, and for law reform initiatives in other jurisdictions.
KW - Capacity
KW - Impaired decision making
KW - Insight
KW - Mental health legislation
KW - Psychiatric compulsion
KW - Scotland
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85113366546&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijlp.2021.101736
DO - 10.1016/j.ijlp.2021.101736
M3 - Article
C2 - 34450485
AN - SCOPUS:85113366546
SN - 0160-2527
VL - 78
JO - International Journal of Law and Psychiatry
JF - International Journal of Law and Psychiatry
M1 - 101736
ER -