Sources of bias in the recall of self-generated data: The role of anchoring

Stuart Fraser, Francis J. Greene*, Kevin F. Mole

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract / Description of output

This study examines two issues. First, we assess the reliability of employment data self-generated by respondents using a survey panel of 280 firms surveyed in 1999 and again in 2002. Our results show that there is a close correlation between self-generated and archival secondary data. Second, we test for bias in the recall of previous years' employment levels and the sources of such bias. We assess three reasons for recall bias: respondent-level factors; firm-level factors; and anchoring. Our regression results indicate that: owners and new respondents; those in firms that changed legal status and/or location; those in smaller firms; and those in growing or declining firms were biased in their recall of prior employment. In addition, growing firms tended to underestimate their growth, which points to anchoring as an explanation for these biases. These biases imply that we have to be careful in delineating performance measures and cautious about how we interpret self-generated managerial information.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)192-208
Number of pages17
JournalBritish Journal of Management
Volume18
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 26 Sept 2006
Externally publishedYes

Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)

  • organizational performance
  • managers perceptions
  • venture performance
  • firm performance
  • provided anchors
  • job creation
  • consequences
  • strategy
  • growth
  • uncertainty

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Sources of bias in the recall of self-generated data: The role of anchoring'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this