Abstract
A critical examination of the case of Lord Advocate v Royal Bank of Scotland and the rules on competition between diligence and floating charges. Attention is given to the circles of priority created by the decision and there is a critique of the approach of JG Birrell in SME vol 4 and the Scottish Law Commission, Report on diligence on the dependence.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 325-46 |
| Journal | Juridical Review |
| Issue number | 5 |
| Publication status | Published - 2000 |
Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)
- floating charge
- diligence
- effectually executed diligence
- arrestment
- trust
- charge and receivership
- Lord Advocate v Royal Bank of Scotland
- circles of priority