Stacked economisation: A research programme for the study of platforms

Koray Caliskan*, Donald MacKenzie, Michel Callon

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract / Description of output

Conceived as a sequel to our papers on economization and marketization (Caliskan and Callon, 2009, 2010), this article presents a research programme for analyzing platforms. Caliskan and Callon (2009) have defined economization as the design and qualification of devices, agencies, representations, networks, and their distributed relations as ‘economic’ by social scientists and market actors. The second installment has presented marketization as a mode of economization that facilitates transactions with money within a socio-technical agencement on a space of power (Caliskan and Callon, 2010). Updating our previous definitions and literature review, we turn our attention in this installment to platforms and propose an alternative approach. Critiquing two hegemonic perspectives on platforms – Platform Anachronism (platforms as mere markets with multiple sides) and Platform Reductionism (platforms as mere surveillance systems) – we define a platform as 1) a stacked economization process bringing together a variety of agencements such as gift, barter, and market, 2) which provides actors with tools of redefining their needs within an exploration space, 3) entailing layered relations of power. We argue that the programme of platform study we describe in this paper provides researchers, economic actors, and policymakers with agile and effective tools of analysis, economization, and regulation.
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Cultural Economy
Early online date12 Dec 2024
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 12 Dec 2024

Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)

  • platform
  • stack
  • economization
  • marketization
  • agencement

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Stacked economisation: A research programme for the study of platforms'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this