Abstract / Description of output
A valid surrogate endpoint allows correct inference to be drawn regarding the effect of an intervention on the unobserved true clinical endpoint of interest. The perceived practical and ethical advantages of substituting a surrogate endpoint for a clinical endpoint have led to a considerable number of statistical methods being proposed for the evaluation of a biomarker as a surrogate endpoint. We review the main statistical schools of thought which have developed and consider how the validation process might be arranged within the regulatory and practical constraints of the drug development process. We conclude by assessing which of the candidate statistical methods offer the best approach for surrogate endpoint evaluation. Copyright (c) 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 183-203 |
Number of pages | 21 |
Journal | STATISTICS IN MEDICINE |
Volume | 25 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 30 Jan 2006 |
Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)
- biomarker
- surrogate
- evaluation
- drug development
- RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIALS
- EVENT TIME DATA
- DRUG DEVELOPMENT
- CARDIOVASCULAR-DISEASES
- JOINT ANALYSIS
- SURVIVAL-DATA
- TO-EVENT
- VALIDATION
- MARKERS
- CANCER