TY - UNPB
T1 - Strand-resolved mutagenicity of DNA damage and repair
AU - Anderson, Craig
AU - Talmane, Lana
AU - Luft, Juliet
AU - Nicholson, Michael D.
AU - Connelly, John
AU - Pich, Oriol
AU - Campbell, Susan
AU - Sundaram, Vasavi
AU - Connor, Frances
AU - Ginnno, Paul A.
AU - Lopez-Bigas, Nuria
AU - Flicek, Paul
AU - Semple, Colin A
AU - Odom, Duncan T
AU - Aitken, Sarah J
AU - Taylor, Martin S
PY - 2022/6/10
Y1 - 2022/6/10
N2 - DNA base damage is a major source of oncogenic mutations (Alexandrov et al. 2020). Such damage can produce strand-phased mutation patterns and multiallelic variation through the process of lesion segregation (Aitken et al. 2020). Here, we exploited these properties to reveal how strand-asymmetric processes, such as replication and transcription, shape DNA damage and repair. Despite distinct mechanisms of leading and lagging strand replication (Burgers, Gordenin, and Kunkel 2016; Baris et al. 2022), we observe identical fidelity and damage tolerance for both strands. For small DNA adducts, our results support a model in which the same translesion polymerase is recruited on-the-fly to both replication strands, starkly contrasting the strand asymmetric tolerance of bulky adducts (Seplyarskiy et al. 2019). We find that DNA damage tolerance is also common during transcription, where RNA-polymerases frequently bypass lesions without triggering repair. At multiple genomic scales, we show the pattern of DNA damage induced mutations is largely shaped by the influence of DNA accessibility on repair efficiency, rather than gradients of DNA damage. Finally, we reveal specific genomic conditions that can corrupt the fidelity of nucleotide excision repair and actively drive oncogenic mutagenesis. These results provide insight into how strand-asymmetric mechanisms underlie the formation, tolerance, and repair of DNA damage, thereby shaping cancer genome evolution.
AB - DNA base damage is a major source of oncogenic mutations (Alexandrov et al. 2020). Such damage can produce strand-phased mutation patterns and multiallelic variation through the process of lesion segregation (Aitken et al. 2020). Here, we exploited these properties to reveal how strand-asymmetric processes, such as replication and transcription, shape DNA damage and repair. Despite distinct mechanisms of leading and lagging strand replication (Burgers, Gordenin, and Kunkel 2016; Baris et al. 2022), we observe identical fidelity and damage tolerance for both strands. For small DNA adducts, our results support a model in which the same translesion polymerase is recruited on-the-fly to both replication strands, starkly contrasting the strand asymmetric tolerance of bulky adducts (Seplyarskiy et al. 2019). We find that DNA damage tolerance is also common during transcription, where RNA-polymerases frequently bypass lesions without triggering repair. At multiple genomic scales, we show the pattern of DNA damage induced mutations is largely shaped by the influence of DNA accessibility on repair efficiency, rather than gradients of DNA damage. Finally, we reveal specific genomic conditions that can corrupt the fidelity of nucleotide excision repair and actively drive oncogenic mutagenesis. These results provide insight into how strand-asymmetric mechanisms underlie the formation, tolerance, and repair of DNA damage, thereby shaping cancer genome evolution.
U2 - 10.1101/2022.06.10.495644
DO - 10.1101/2022.06.10.495644
M3 - Preprint
BT - Strand-resolved mutagenicity of DNA damage and repair
PB - bioRxiv
ER -