Subjective perceptions of difference in multi-level states: Regional values, embeddedness, and bias in Canadian provinces

Ailsa Henderson*, Antoine Bilodeau, Luc Turgeon, Stephen E. White

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Subnational variations in political culture and policy attitudes are a hallmark feature of multi-level systems of government. Yet we know comparatively little about how and why citizens of these systems subjectively perceive regional differences in political values. Using data from a specially commissioned survey under the auspices of the Provincial Diversity Project, this article analyses subjective perceptions of difference across provinces in Canada. It shows that individuals believe their regions have distinct political values, but also that they systematically overestimate that difference. In their estimations of regional distinctiveness, individuals are informed by the value profiles of the regions in which they live, but also by their own policy preferences. The findings clarify the salience of internal boundaries within multi-level or federal states, and enable us to understand how myths of distinctiveness flourish, but also provide an important extension on debates about misperceptions in politics.
Original languageEnglish
Article numberpjae008
Pages (from-to)58-88
Number of pages31
JournalPublius: The Journal of Federalism
Volume55
Issue number1
Early online date10 Oct 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Subjective perceptions of difference in multi-level states: Regional values, embeddedness, and bias in Canadian provinces'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this