TY - JOUR
T1 - Supporting conservationists’ mental health through better working conditions
AU - Pienkowski, Thomas
AU - Keane, Aidan
AU - Castelló y tickell, Sofia
AU - De lange, Emiel
AU - Hazenbosch, Mirjam
AU - Khanyari, Munib
AU - Arlidge, William N. S.
AU - Baranyi, Gergő
AU - Brittain, Stephanie
AU - Kapoor, Vena
AU - Mohan, Vik
AU - Papworth, Sarah
AU - Ravi, Roshni
AU - Smit, Izak P.j.
AU - Milner‐gulland, E.j.
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank all those who participated in the Life in Conservation internet survey. This work was supported by the Natural Environment Research Council (grant NE/L002612/1) and the Tasso Leventis Foundation, University of Oxford. W.N.S.A. is supported by a postdoctoral research fellowship from the Alexander von Humboldt‐Stiftung (grant NZL ‐ 1218398 ‐ HFST‐P).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors. Conservation Biology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology.
PY - 2023/10
Y1 - 2023/10
N2 - Biodiversity conservation work can be challenging but rewarding, and both aspects have potential consequences for conservationists’ mental health. Yet, little is known about patterns of mental health among conservationists and its associated workplace protective and risk factors. A better understanding might help improve working conditions, supporting conservationists’ job satisfaction, productivity, and engagement, while reducing costs from staff turnover, absenteeism, and presenteeism. We surveyed 2311 conservation professionals working in 122 countries through an internet survey shared via mailing lists, social media, and other channels. We asked them about experiences of psychological distress, working conditions, and personal characteristics. Over half were from and worked in Europe and North America, and most had a university-level education, were in desk-based academic and practitioner roles, and responded in English. Heavy workload, job demands, and organizational instability were linked to higher distress, but job stability and satisfaction with one's contributions to conservation were associated with lower distress. Respondents with low dispositional and conservation-specific optimism, poor physical health, and limited social support, women, and early-career professionals were most at risk of distress in our sample. Our results flag important risk factors that employers could consider, although further research is needed among groups underrepresented in our sample. Drawing on evidence-based occupational health interventions, we suggest measures that could promote better working conditions and thus may improve conservationists’ mental health and abilities to protect nature.
AB - Biodiversity conservation work can be challenging but rewarding, and both aspects have potential consequences for conservationists’ mental health. Yet, little is known about patterns of mental health among conservationists and its associated workplace protective and risk factors. A better understanding might help improve working conditions, supporting conservationists’ job satisfaction, productivity, and engagement, while reducing costs from staff turnover, absenteeism, and presenteeism. We surveyed 2311 conservation professionals working in 122 countries through an internet survey shared via mailing lists, social media, and other channels. We asked them about experiences of psychological distress, working conditions, and personal characteristics. Over half were from and worked in Europe and North America, and most had a university-level education, were in desk-based academic and practitioner roles, and responded in English. Heavy workload, job demands, and organizational instability were linked to higher distress, but job stability and satisfaction with one's contributions to conservation were associated with lower distress. Respondents with low dispositional and conservation-specific optimism, poor physical health, and limited social support, women, and early-career professionals were most at risk of distress in our sample. Our results flag important risk factors that employers could consider, although further research is needed among groups underrepresented in our sample. Drawing on evidence-based occupational health interventions, we suggest measures that could promote better working conditions and thus may improve conservationists’ mental health and abilities to protect nature.
KW - ambientalistas
KW - bienestar laboral
KW - conservacionistas
KW - conservation psychology
KW - conservationists
KW - environmentalists
KW - estrés psicológico
KW - mental health
KW - occupational health
KW - positive psychology
KW - psicología de la conservación
KW - psicología positiva
KW - psychological distress
KW - salud laboral
KW - salud mental
KW - workplace well-being
U2 - 10.1111/cobi.14097
DO - 10.1111/cobi.14097
M3 - Article
SN - 0888-8892
VL - 37
JO - Conservation biology
JF - Conservation biology
IS - 5
M1 - e14097
ER -