Synthetic gene circuits for metabolic control: design trade-offs and constraints

Diego A. Oyarzún, Guy-Bart V. Stan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

A grand challenge in synthetic biology is to push the design of biomolecular circuits from purely genetic constructs towards systems that interface different levels of the cellular machinery, including signalling networks and metabolic pathways. In this paper, we focus on a genetic circuit for feedback regulation of unbranched metabolic pathways. The objective of this feedback system is to dampen the effect of flux perturbations caused by changes in cellular demands or by engineered pathways consuming metabolic intermediates. We consider a mathematical model for a control circuit with an operon architecture, whereby the expression of all pathway enzymes is transcriptionally repressed by the metabolic product. We address the existence and stability of the steady state, the dynamic response of the network under perturbations, and their dependence on common tuneable knobs such as the promoter characteristic and ribosome binding site (RBS) strengths. Our analysis reveals trade-offs between the steady state of the enzymes and the intermediates, together with a separation principle between promoter and RBS design. We show that enzymatic saturation imposes limits on the parameter design space, which must be satisfied to prevent metabolite accumulation and guarantee the stability of the network. The use of promoters with a broad dynamic range and a small leaky expression enlarges the design space. Simulation results with realistic parameter values also suggest that the control circuit can effectively upregulate enzyme production to compensate flux perturbations.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)20120671
Number of pages1
JournalJournal of the Royal Society, Interface
Volume10
Issue number78
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 6 Jan 2013

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Synthetic gene circuits for metabolic control: design trade-offs and constraints'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this