Testing potential psychological predictors of attitudes towards cultured meat

Matti Wilks*, Clive J.C. Phillips, Kelly Fielding, Matthew J. Hornsey

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


Cultured meat is an emerging food technology that has the potential to resolve many of the social, environmental and ethical issues surrounding traditional factory farming practices. Recently, research has begun to explore consumer attitudes to the product, revealing a number of barriers and demographic predictors. However, our understanding of the psychological mechanisms that underpin attitudes to cultured meat remains limited. In the current study, we draw on an attitude roots model (Hornsey & Fielding, 2017) to explore a range of psychological mechanisms that may underpin attitudes to cultured meat. In terms of negative attitudes and intentions toward cultured meat, the most powerful predictors were food neophobia, political conservatism, and distrust of food scientists. When it comes to absolute opposition to cultured meat - defined by the unconditional belief that it should never be allowed under any circumstances - the strongest predictors were food and hygiene disgust sensitivity subscales, food neophobia, and conspiratorial ideation. A number of presumed mechanisms held no relationships to cultured meat attitudes, including social dominance orientation, speciesism, and naturalness bias. The null results on naturalness bias are of particular interest given recent research identifying concerns about naturalness as a key barrier to consumer acceptance. These results demonstrate the need for a more nuanced understanding of the psychological mechanisms that contribute to cultured meat attitudes and engagement.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)137-145
Number of pages9
Early online date4 Feb 2019
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2019


Dive into the research topics of 'Testing potential psychological predictors of attitudes towards cultured meat'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this