The authenticity of the documents at Andocides' On the Mysteries 77-79 and 83-84

Mirko Canevaro; Edward M.  Harris

doi:10.13130/1128-8221/10645

The authenticity of the documents at Andocides' On the Mysteries 77-79 and 83-84

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract / Description of output

In 2012 M. Canevaro and E. M. Harris published an essay about the documents inserted into the text of Andocides’ speech On the Mysteries. These included the decree of Patrocleides (Andoc. 1.74-76), the decree of Teisamenus (Andoc. 1.83-84), the so-called New Laws (Andoc. 1.85 and 87) and the Decree of Demophantus (Andoc. 1.96-98).This analysis showed that these documents were forgeries composed during a later period and inserted into the text of On the Mysteries. M. H. Hansen has now attempted to defend the authenticity of the documents found at Andoc. 1.74-76 and 83-84. In this essay, Canevaro and Harris show that his arguments are not convincing and provide additional evidence against the authenticity of these documents.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	9-49
Number of pages	41
Journal	Dike
Volume	19
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.13130/1128-8221/10645
Publication status	Published - 31 Dec 2017

Access to Document

10.13130/1128-8221/10645Licence: Creative Commons: Attribution (CC-BY)

CanevaroEtalD2018TheAuthenticityOfTheDocumentsAtAndocidesFinal published version, 524 KBLicence: Unspecified

Cite this

@article{f13564e50c0442eaa8e395ac5fde1514,

title = "The authenticity of the documents at Andocides' On the Mysteries 77-79 and 83-84",

abstract = "In 2012 M. Canevaro and E. M. Harris published an essay about the documents inserted into the text of Andocides{\textquoteright} speech On the Mysteries. These included the decree of Patrocleides (Andoc. 1.74-76), the decree of Teisamenus (Andoc. 1.83-84), the so-called New Laws (Andoc. 1.85 and 87) and the Decree of Demophantus (Andoc. 1.96-98).This analysis showed that these documents were forgeries composed during a later period and inserted into the text of On the Mysteries. M. H. Hansen has now attempted to defend the authenticity of the documents found at Andoc. 1.74-76 and 83-84. In this essay, Canevaro and Harris show that his arguments are not convincing and provide additional evidence against the authenticity of these documents.",

author = "Mirko Canevaro and Harris, {Edward M.}",

year = "2017",

month = dec,

day = "31",

doi = "10.13130/1128-8221/10645",

language = "English",

volume = "19",

pages = "9--49",

journal = "Dike",

issn = "1128-8221",

publisher = "Universit{\'a} degli Studi de Milano",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The authenticity of the documents at Andocides' On the Mysteries 77-79 and 83-84

AU - Canevaro, Mirko

AU - Harris, Edward M.

PY - 2017/12/31

Y1 - 2017/12/31

N2 - In 2012 M. Canevaro and E. M. Harris published an essay about the documents inserted into the text of Andocides’ speech On the Mysteries. These included the decree of Patrocleides (Andoc. 1.74-76), the decree of Teisamenus (Andoc. 1.83-84), the so-called New Laws (Andoc. 1.85 and 87) and the Decree of Demophantus (Andoc. 1.96-98).This analysis showed that these documents were forgeries composed during a later period and inserted into the text of On the Mysteries. M. H. Hansen has now attempted to defend the authenticity of the documents found at Andoc. 1.74-76 and 83-84. In this essay, Canevaro and Harris show that his arguments are not convincing and provide additional evidence against the authenticity of these documents.

AB - In 2012 M. Canevaro and E. M. Harris published an essay about the documents inserted into the text of Andocides’ speech On the Mysteries. These included the decree of Patrocleides (Andoc. 1.74-76), the decree of Teisamenus (Andoc. 1.83-84), the so-called New Laws (Andoc. 1.85 and 87) and the Decree of Demophantus (Andoc. 1.96-98).This analysis showed that these documents were forgeries composed during a later period and inserted into the text of On the Mysteries. M. H. Hansen has now attempted to defend the authenticity of the documents found at Andoc. 1.74-76 and 83-84. In this essay, Canevaro and Harris show that his arguments are not convincing and provide additional evidence against the authenticity of these documents.

UR - http://riviste.unimi.it/index.php/Dike

U2 - 10.13130/1128-8221/10645

DO - 10.13130/1128-8221/10645

M3 - Article

SN - 1128-8221

VL - 19

SP - 9

EP - 49

JO - Dike

JF - Dike

ER -

The authenticity of the documents at Andocides' On the Mysteries 77-79 and 83-84

Abstract / Description of output

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this