'The basic stuff of our memories': Embodying and embedding discipline

Julie Brownlie*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract / Description of output

In recent political debates about physical chastisement, children have been positioned as 'potential' selves and have had their bodies mapped in specific ways. This article compares these discourses with findings from a study of parents' views of proposed legislation on physical discipline. It is argued that parents' talk about physical discipline is temporal not only because it is concerned with the nature of the child's body/self at the time of punishment but because parents engage with memories from their own childhood and, therefore, with how childhood selves have been disciplined across social and biographical time. Drawing on sociological work on the body, memory and childhood, the article explores two aspects of disciplinary practices - their embodied and embedded nature - which, to date, have been under researched and under theorised in debates about physical chastisement.

Original languageEnglish
Number of pages24
JournalSociological Research Online
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 20 Dec 2006

Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)

  • TIME
  • BODY
  • legal discourses
  • bodies
  • childhood
  • physical chastisement
  • memory


Dive into the research topics of ''The basic stuff of our memories': Embodying and embedding discipline'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this