The beginning of Melissus' On Nature or On What-Is: A reconstruction

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The philosophical treatise of Melissus of Samos is often maintained to have a strictly deductive argumentative structure. This article attempts to confirm this thesis by establishing that such a structure is instituted beginning from its title and introductory sphragis. Extant paraphrases of Melissus’ treatise are examined and are argued (in line with some previous treatments) to provide a highly illuminating indication that the work began from the hypothesis that something is. Next, an account of how the first verbatim fragment (DK30B1) takes up this prefatory material is given along with a reconstructed text and translation of the title, preface and argument for the sempiternity of what-is.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)19-34
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Hellenic Studies
Volume135
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Keywords

  • Melissus
  • Parmenides
  • sempiternity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The beginning of Melissus' On Nature or On What-Is: A reconstruction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this