The blind hens' challenge: Does it undermine the view that only welfare matters in our dealings with animals?

Peter Sandøe*, Paul M. Hocking, Bjorn Förkman, Kirsty Haldane, Helle H. Kristensen, Clare Palmer

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Animal ethicists have recently debated the ethical questions raised by disenhancing animals to improve their welfare. Here, we focus on the particular case of breeding blind hens for commercial egg-laying systems, in order to benefit their welfare. Many people find breeding blind hens intuitively repellent, yet ‘welfare-only’ positions appear to be committed to endorsing this possibility if it produces welfare gains. We call this the ‘Blind Hens’ Challenge’. In this paper, we argue that there are both empirical and theoretical reasons why even those adopting ‘welfare-only’ views should be concerned about breeding blind hens. But we also argue that alternative views, which (for example) claim that it is important to respect the telos or rights of an animal, do not offer a more convincing solution to questions raised by the possibility of disenhancing animals for their own benefit.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)727-742
Number of pages16
JournalEnvironmental Values
Volume23
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2014

Keywords

  • Animal ethics
  • Animal welfare
  • Blind hens
  • Disenhancement
  • Egg production
  • Perfectionism
  • Telos
  • Utilitarianism

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The blind hens' challenge: Does it undermine the view that only welfare matters in our dealings with animals?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this