The Continuing Confused Saga of Contract and Error

Martin Hogg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This article examines the law of error as it relates to contract formation in the light of the decision of the Court of Session in Parvaiz v Thresher Wines [2008] CSOH 160. While the decision seems correct, the law's analysis and classification of error as it relates to contract formation remains confused, with competing typologies continuing to cause problems for practitioners, judges and students of the law.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)286-90
Number of pages4
JournalEdinburgh Law Review
Volume13
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Keywords

  • contract error

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Continuing Confused Saga of Contract and Error'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this