Abstract
This article examines the law of error as it relates to contract formation in the light of the decision of the Court of Session in Parvaiz v Thresher Wines [2008] CSOH 160. While the decision seems correct, the law's analysis and classification of error as it relates to contract formation remains confused, with competing typologies continuing to cause problems for practitioners, judges and students of the law.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 286-90 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | Edinburgh Law Review |
| Volume | 13 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2009 |
Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)
- contract error