Abstract
The paper discusses the debate arising from the Israeli case of Qimron v Shanks (2000) about the copyright (if any) in reconstructive editorial work on ancient documents, focusing particularly on the example provided by the Dead Sea Scrolls but also referring to other examples, in particular that of music, debated in the English Court of Appeal in Hyperion Records v Sawkins. It is argued that such reconstructive work attracts and deserves copyright for the reconstructing editor, and the opposed position is analysed critically.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Publisher | University of Edinburgh, School of Law, Working Papers |
| Number of pages | 30 |
| Publication status | Published - 4 Jul 2014 |
Publication series
| Name | Edinburgh Law School Working Papers |
|---|---|
| No. | 2014/32 |
Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)
- Copyright
- Reconstructive editorial work
- Originality
- Moral rights
- Dead Sea Scrolls
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Dead Sea Scrolls and the Legal Definition of Authorship'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Research output
- 1 Chapter (peer-reviewed)
-
The scrolls and the legal definition of authorship
MacQueen, H., 2010, The Oxford Handbook of the Dead Sea Scrolls. Lim, T. H. & Collins, J. J. (eds.). Oxford University Press, p. 723-748 26 p. (Oxford Handbooks in Religion and Theology).Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter (peer-reviewed)
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver