Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The effective number and profile of causative markers in GWAS

Research output: Contribution to conferenceAbstractpeer-review

Abstract

Over the past decade, animal databases have amassed abundant genomic data, with gradual progression from us- ing thousands to using millions of markers. Against expectations, this increase in marker density only marginally increased the predictivity of the standard quantitative genetic models. To reason for this, we used stochastic sim- ulations and statistical modelling to understand the marker profile around the quantitative trait nucleotides (QTN) in populations with a small effective population size (Ne). We applied the single-step genome-wide association to simulated datasets with varying Ne and number of genotyped individuals with phenotypes. We decomposed resulting Manhattan plots into signals from the QTN itself, QTN profile, relationships, and noise. In this sense, the QTN profiles can be understood as pairwise linkage disequilibrium curves, with width inversely related to Ne. Thus, in larger populations, QTN profiles were narrow, which, coupled with weaker relationships, facilitated QTN identification (with ample phenotypic data). Conversely, smaller populations yielded wider QTN profiles that blended with relationship signals and noise, resulting in reduced GWAS resolution and QTN identification. In terms of predictivity, predictions in large populations required dense marker panels and QTN or nearby markers identified. In contrast, in smaller populations, medium marker density sufficed as the QTN profiles captured the QTN without its explicit identification.
Original languageEnglish
Pages1-1
Number of pages1
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sept 2024
EventThe 75th EAAP Annual Meeting - Florence, Italy
Duration: 1 Sept 20245 Sept 2024

Conference

ConferenceThe 75th EAAP Annual Meeting
Country/TerritoryItaly
CityFlorence
Period1/09/245/09/24

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The effective number and profile of causative markers in GWAS'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this