TY - JOUR
T1 - The Effects on Health of a Publicly Funded Domestic Heating Programme
T2 - A Prospective Controlled Study
AU - Walker, Jeremy
AU - Mitchell, R.
AU - Petticrew, M.
AU - Platt, S.
PY - 2009/1
Y1 - 2009/1
N2 - Objective: To assess the effect of a publicly funded
domestic heating programme on self-reported health.
Design, setting and participants: A prospective
controlled study of 1281 households in Scotland receiving
new central heating under a publicly funded initiative, and
1084 comparison households not receiving new heating.
The main outcome measures were self-reported diagnosis
of asthma, bronchitis, eczema, nasal allergy, heart
disease, circulatory problems or high blood pressure;
number of primary care encounters and hospital contacts
in the past year; and SF-36 Health Survey scores.
Results: Usable data were obtained from 61.4% of 3849
respondents originally recruited. Heating recipients
reported higher scores on the SF-36 Physical Functioning
scale (difference 2.51; 95% CI 0.67 to 4.37) and General
Health scale (difference 2.57; 95% CI 0.90 to 4.34). They
were less likely to report having received a first diagnosis
of heart disease (OR 0.69; 95% CI 0.52 to 0.91) or high
blood pressure (OR 0.77; 95% CI 0.61 to 0.97), but the
groups did not differ significantly in use of primary care or hospital services.
Conclusions: Provision of central heating was associated
with significant positive effects on general health and
physical functioning; however, effect sizes were small.
Evidence of a reduced risk of first diagnosis with heart
disease or high blood pressure must be interpreted with
caution, due to the self-reported nature of the outcomes,
the limited time period and the failure to detect any
difference in health service use.
AB - Objective: To assess the effect of a publicly funded
domestic heating programme on self-reported health.
Design, setting and participants: A prospective
controlled study of 1281 households in Scotland receiving
new central heating under a publicly funded initiative, and
1084 comparison households not receiving new heating.
The main outcome measures were self-reported diagnosis
of asthma, bronchitis, eczema, nasal allergy, heart
disease, circulatory problems or high blood pressure;
number of primary care encounters and hospital contacts
in the past year; and SF-36 Health Survey scores.
Results: Usable data were obtained from 61.4% of 3849
respondents originally recruited. Heating recipients
reported higher scores on the SF-36 Physical Functioning
scale (difference 2.51; 95% CI 0.67 to 4.37) and General
Health scale (difference 2.57; 95% CI 0.90 to 4.34). They
were less likely to report having received a first diagnosis
of heart disease (OR 0.69; 95% CI 0.52 to 0.91) or high
blood pressure (OR 0.77; 95% CI 0.61 to 0.97), but the
groups did not differ significantly in use of primary care or hospital services.
Conclusions: Provision of central heating was associated
with significant positive effects on general health and
physical functioning; however, effect sizes were small.
Evidence of a reduced risk of first diagnosis with heart
disease or high blood pressure must be interpreted with
caution, due to the self-reported nature of the outcomes,
the limited time period and the failure to detect any
difference in health service use.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=58249104046&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/jech.2008.074096
DO - 10.1136/jech.2008.074096
M3 - Article
SN - 0143-005X
VL - 63
SP - 12
EP - 17
JO - Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health
JF - Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health
IS - 1
ER -