The Elective and Automatic Theories of Termination in the Common Law of the Contract of Employment: Conundrum Resolved?

David Cabrelli, Rebecca Zahn

Research output: Working paper

Abstract / Description of output

If a party to an employment contract commits a repudiatory dismissal or resignation, it has long been unclear whether the other party has the option either to terminate or affirm the contract (the elective theory) or whether the former's breach operates to bring the contract of employment to an end (the automatic theory). The recent decision of the Supreme Court in Société Générale (London Branch) v Geys has finally resolved this question. By a majority, the Supreme Court held that the elective theory also applies in the context of a wrongful repudiation of the employment contract by express dismissal or resignation. This note examines the significance of Geys in the context of the common law of the contract of employment and evaluates whether a number of related issues surrounding the breach and termination of the employment contract have been resolved.
Original languageEnglish
PublisherSocial Science Research Network (SSRN)
Number of pages14
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Nov 2013

Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)

  • employment law
  • Contract of Employment
  • Termination of the Contract of Employment
  • Gunton v Richmond-upon-Thames London Borough Council
  • Societe Generale (London Branch) v Geys

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Elective and Automatic Theories of Termination in the Common Law of the Contract of Employment: Conundrum Resolved?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this