The English Question I: Is EVEL the Answer?

Daniel Kenealy; Jan Eichhorn; Richard Parry; Lindsay Paterson; Alexandra Remond

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-52818-2_5

The English Question I: Is EVEL the Answer?

Daniel Kenealy, Jan Eichhorn, Richard Parry, Lindsay Paterson, Alexandra Remond

School of Social and Political Science

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter

Abstract / Description of output

This chapter offers an in-depth look at views held by people in England to a range of governance proposals. The chapter analyses how people in England view several distinct proposals, investigating whether there are differences between particular groups of people. It goes on to consider whether people have a favoured option and whether that option differs across different groups. In addition to exploring preference for governance options, the chapter presents findings on people’s preferred mechanism of making change. The chapter reveals a public open to multiple options for reforming the way that England is governed.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Publics, Elites and Constitutional Change in the UK
Subtitle of host publication	A Missed Opportunity?
Editors	Daniel Kenealy, Jan Eichhorn, Richard Parry, Lindsay Paterson, Alexandra Remond
Publisher	Palgrave Macmillan
Chapter	5
Pages	103-124
Edition	1
ISBN (Electronic)	9783319528182
ISBN (Print)	9783319528175
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52818-2_5
Publication status	Published - 2017

Publication series

Name	Comparative Territorial Politics
Publisher	Palgrave Macmillan UK

Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)

UK politics
English question
English votes for English laws
constitution
Englishness

Access to Document

10.1007/978-3-319-52818-2_5

6 Chapter
1 Book

Conclusion
Kenealy, D., Eichhorn, J., Parry, R., Paterson, L. & Remond, A., 2017, Publics, Elites and Constitutional Change in the UK: A Missed Opportunity?. Kenealy, D., Eichhorn, J., Parry, R., Paterson, L. & Remond, A. (eds.). 1 ed. Palgrave Macmillan, p. 149-159 (Comparative Territorial Politics).
Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter
Introduction
Kenealy, D., Eichhorn, J., Parry, R., Paterson, L. & Remond, A., 2017, Publics, Elites and Constitutional Change in the UK: A Missed Opportunity?. Kenealy, D., Eichhorn, J., Parry, R., Paterson, L. & Remond, A. (eds.). 1 ed. Palgrave Macmillan, p. 1-19 (Comparative Territorial Politics).
Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter
Political Engagement
Kenealy, D., Eichhorn, J., Parry, R., Paterson, L. & Remond, A., 2017, Publics, Elites and Constitutional Change in the UK: A Missed Opportunity?. Kenealy, D., Eichhorn, J., Parry, R., Paterson, L. & Remond, A. (eds.). 1 ed. Palgrave Macmillan, p. 21-44 (Comparative Territorial Politics).
Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter

Cite this

Kenealy, D., Eichhorn, J., Parry, R., Paterson, L., & Remond, A. (2017). The English Question I: Is EVEL the Answer? In D. Kenealy, J. Eichhorn, R. Parry, L. Paterson, & A. Remond (Eds.), Publics, Elites and Constitutional Change in the UK: A Missed Opportunity? (1 ed., pp. 103-124). (Comparative Territorial Politics). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52818-2_5

@inbook{026e070ac8de4629a29e354b907c83f8,

title = "The English Question I: Is EVEL the Answer?",

abstract = "This chapter offers an in-depth look at views held by people in England to a range of governance proposals. The chapter analyses how people in England view several distinct proposals, investigating whether there are differences between particular groups of people. It goes on to consider whether people have a favoured option and whether that option differs across different groups. In addition to exploring preference for governance options, the chapter presents findings on people{\textquoteright}s preferred mechanism of making change. The chapter reveals a public open to multiple options for reforming the way that England is governed.",

keywords = "UK politics, English question, English votes for English laws, constitution, Englishness",

author = "Daniel Kenealy and Jan Eichhorn and Richard Parry and Lindsay Paterson and Alexandra Remond",

year = "2017",

doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-52818-2_5",

language = "English",

isbn = "9783319528175",

series = "Comparative Territorial Politics",

publisher = "Palgrave Macmillan",

pages = "103--124",

editor = "Daniel Kenealy and Jan Eichhorn and Richard Parry and Lindsay Paterson and Alexandra Remond",

booktitle = "Publics, Elites and Constitutional Change in the UK",

edition = "1",

}

The English Question I: Is EVEL the Answer? / Kenealy, Daniel ; Eichhorn, Jan ; Parry, Richard et al.
Publics, Elites and Constitutional Change in the UK: A Missed Opportunity?. ed. / Daniel Kenealy; Jan Eichhorn; Richard Parry; Lindsay Paterson; Alexandra Remond. 1. ed. Palgrave Macmillan, 2017. p. 103-124 (Comparative Territorial Politics).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - The English Question I

T2 - Is EVEL the Answer?

AU - Kenealy, Daniel

AU - Eichhorn, Jan

AU - Parry, Richard

AU - Paterson, Lindsay

AU - Remond, Alexandra

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - This chapter offers an in-depth look at views held by people in England to a range of governance proposals. The chapter analyses how people in England view several distinct proposals, investigating whether there are differences between particular groups of people. It goes on to consider whether people have a favoured option and whether that option differs across different groups. In addition to exploring preference for governance options, the chapter presents findings on people’s preferred mechanism of making change. The chapter reveals a public open to multiple options for reforming the way that England is governed.

AB - This chapter offers an in-depth look at views held by people in England to a range of governance proposals. The chapter analyses how people in England view several distinct proposals, investigating whether there are differences between particular groups of people. It goes on to consider whether people have a favoured option and whether that option differs across different groups. In addition to exploring preference for governance options, the chapter presents findings on people’s preferred mechanism of making change. The chapter reveals a public open to multiple options for reforming the way that England is governed.

KW - UK politics

KW - English question

KW - English votes for English laws

KW - constitution

KW - Englishness

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-52818-2_5

DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-52818-2_5

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9783319528175

T3 - Comparative Territorial Politics

SP - 103

EP - 124

BT - Publics, Elites and Constitutional Change in the UK

A2 - Kenealy, Daniel

A2 - Eichhorn, Jan

A2 - Parry, Richard

A2 - Paterson, Lindsay

A2 - Remond, Alexandra

PB - Palgrave Macmillan

ER -

The English Question I: Is EVEL the Answer?

Abstract / Description of output

Publication series

Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Research output

Conclusion

Introduction

Political Engagement

Cite this