Abstract / Description of output
he projection pattern of the existential/uniqueness presupposition of a wh-complement varies depending on the predicate that embeds it. This variation poses problems for existing accounts that treat the presupposition as a seman-tic contribution of an operator merging with the wh-complement (Dayal, 1996) or of the embedding predicate (Uegaki, 2015). I propose that the problems can be solved if the existential/uniqueness presupposition is contributed by the propositions corresponding to the answers of the embedded question, under the Hamblin/Karttunen semantics for questions.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1-41 |
| Journal | Linguistics and Philosophy |
| Volume | n/a |
| Early online date | 8 Sept 2020 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 8 Sept 2020 |
Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)
- questions
- embedded questions
- wh-complements
- presupposition of questions
- uniqueness presupposition
