TY - JOUR
T1 - The impact of contextual, maternal and prenatal factors on receptive language in a Chilean longitudinal birth cohort
AU - Morales, María Francisca
AU - Farkas, Chamarrita
AU - Aristotelous, Eleanor
AU - MacBeth, Angus
PY - 2020/11/1
Y1 - 2020/11/1
N2 - A secondary analysis was conducted on longitudinal data collected from ELPI, a representative Chilean survey to model Chilean infant’s receptive language using contextual, maternal and prenatal factors. The sample for the current study comprised children aged between 36 and 48 months (n = 3921). The sample was re-assessed when children were aged 60–72 months (n = 3100). Linear regression analyses were conducted. At the first time point, all the predictors included were significant (living area, health system provision, maternal intelligence and education, adolescent pregnancy, maternal medical appointments during pregnancy, and presence of a significant other at childbirth), except for smoking during pregnancy. The model explained 13% of the variance. However, when timepoint one receptive language scores were included in the analyses for when children were aged 60–72 months, only two variables remained as significant predictors: previous receptive language scores and maternal education, explaining 21% of the variance. Findings and implications are discussed.
AB - A secondary analysis was conducted on longitudinal data collected from ELPI, a representative Chilean survey to model Chilean infant’s receptive language using contextual, maternal and prenatal factors. The sample for the current study comprised children aged between 36 and 48 months (n = 3921). The sample was re-assessed when children were aged 60–72 months (n = 3100). Linear regression analyses were conducted. At the first time point, all the predictors included were significant (living area, health system provision, maternal intelligence and education, adolescent pregnancy, maternal medical appointments during pregnancy, and presence of a significant other at childbirth), except for smoking during pregnancy. The model explained 13% of the variance. However, when timepoint one receptive language scores were included in the analyses for when children were aged 60–72 months, only two variables remained as significant predictors: previous receptive language scores and maternal education, explaining 21% of the variance. Findings and implications are discussed.
KW - maternal characteristics
KW - prenatal factors
KW - receptive language
KW - resource access
KW - social support
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85094658970&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10578-020-01091-5
DO - 10.1007/s10578-020-01091-5
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85094658970
SN - 0009-398X
JO - Child psychiatry and human development
JF - Child psychiatry and human development
ER -