TY - JOUR
T1 - The impact of information structure on the emergence of differential object marking
T2 - An experimental study
AU - Tal, Shira
AU - Smith, Kenny
AU - Culbertson, Jennifer
AU - Grossman, Eitan
AU - Arnon, Inbal
N1 - We would like to thank Giorgio Iemmolo, Hagay Schurr, and Alena Witzlack Makarevich for helpful discussions. This research received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme (grant agreement 681942 held by KS and grant agreement 757643 held by JC). It was also supported by the Israeli Science Foundation grant number 584/16 awarded to IA. ST was funded by the Mandel Scholion Center at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
PY - 2022/3
Y1 - 2022/3
N2 - Many languages exhibit differential object marking (DOM), where only certain types of grammatical objects are marked with morphological cases. Traditionally, it has been claimed that DOM arises as a way to prevent ambiguity by marking objects that might otherwise be mistaken for subjects (e.g., animate objects). While some recent experimental work supports this account, research on language typology suggests at least one alternative hypothesis. In particular, DOM may instead arise as a way of marking objects that are atypical from the point of view of information structure. According to this account, rather than being marked to avoid ambiguity, objects are marked when they are given (already familiar in the discourse) rather than new. Here, we experimentally investigate this hypothesis using two artificial language learning experiments. We find that information structure impacts participants’ object marking, but in an indirect way: atypical information structure leads to a change in word order, which then triggers increased object marking. Interestingly, this staged process of change is compatible with documented cases of DOM emergence. We argue that this process is driven by two cognitive tendencies. First, a tendency to place discourse given information before new information, and second, a tendency to mark noncanonical word order. Taken together, our findings provide corroborating evidence for the role of information structure in the emergence of DOM systems.
AB - Many languages exhibit differential object marking (DOM), where only certain types of grammatical objects are marked with morphological cases. Traditionally, it has been claimed that DOM arises as a way to prevent ambiguity by marking objects that might otherwise be mistaken for subjects (e.g., animate objects). While some recent experimental work supports this account, research on language typology suggests at least one alternative hypothesis. In particular, DOM may instead arise as a way of marking objects that are atypical from the point of view of information structure. According to this account, rather than being marked to avoid ambiguity, objects are marked when they are given (already familiar in the discourse) rather than new. Here, we experimentally investigate this hypothesis using two artificial language learning experiments. We find that information structure impacts participants’ object marking, but in an indirect way: atypical information structure leads to a change in word order, which then triggers increased object marking. Interestingly, this staged process of change is compatible with documented cases of DOM emergence. We argue that this process is driven by two cognitive tendencies. First, a tendency to place discourse given information before new information, and second, a tendency to mark noncanonical word order. Taken together, our findings provide corroborating evidence for the role of information structure in the emergence of DOM systems.
KW - learning biases
KW - artificial language learning
KW - informal structure
KW - language universals
KW - differential object marking
U2 - 10.1111/cogs.13119
DO - 10.1111/cogs.13119
M3 - Article
SN - 1551-6709
VL - 46
JO - Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal
JF - Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal
IS - 3
M1 - e13119
ER -