The Impact of Stellar Multiplicity on Planetary Systems, I. The Ruinous Influence of Close Binary Companions

Adam L. Kraus, Michael J. Ireland, Daniel Huber, Andrew W. Mann, Trent J. Dupuy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


The dynamical influence of binary companions is expected to profoundly influence planetary systems. However, the difficulty of identifying planets in binary systems has left the magnitude of this effect uncertain; despite numerous theoretical hurdles to their formation and survival, at least some binary systems clearly host planets. We present high-resolution imaging of 382 Kepler Objects of Interest (KOIs) obtained using adaptive-optics imaging and nonredundant aperture-mask interferometry (NRM) on the Keck-II telescope. Among the full sample of 506 candidate binary companions to KOIs, we super-resolve some binary systems to projected separations of 0.4; we instead only found 23 companions (a 4.6 sigma deficit), many of which must be wider pairs that are only close in projection. When the binary population is parametrized with a semimajor axis cutoff a_cut and a suppression factor inside that cutoff S_bin, we find with correlated uncertainties that inside a_cut = 47 +59/-23 AU, the planet occurrence rate in binary systems is only S_bin = 0.34 +0.14/-0.15 times that of wider binaries or single stars. Our results demonstrate that a fifth of all solar-type stars in the Milky Way are disallowed from hosting planetary systems due to the influence of a binary companion.
Original languageEnglish
Article number8
Number of pages17
JournalAstronomical Journal
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 20 Jun 2016


  • astro-ph.EP
  • close – binaries
  • general – binaries
  • binaries
  • visual – planets and satellites
  • detection – planets and satellites
  • dynamical evolution and stability
  • planets and satellites: formation


Dive into the research topics of 'The Impact of Stellar Multiplicity on Planetary Systems, I. The Ruinous Influence of Close Binary Companions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this