The Importance of a Full Clinical Examination: Assessment of Index Lesions Referred to a Skin Cancer Clinic Without a Total Body Skin Examination Would Miss One in Three Melanomas

Benjamin Aldridge, Lisa Naysmith, E. Ting Ooi, Caroline Sian Murray, Jonathan Rees

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Traditional clinical teaching emphasises the importance of a full clinical examination. In the clinical assessment of lesions that may be skin cancer, full examination allows detection of incidental lesions, as well as helping
in the characterisation of the index lesion. Despite this, a total body skin examination is not always performed. Based on two prospective studies of over 1,800 sequential patients in two UK centres we show that over one
third of melanomas detected in secondary care are found as incidental lesions, in patients referred for assessment of other potential skin cancers. The majority of these melanomas occurred in patients whose index lesion turned
out to be benign. Alternative models of care – for instance some models of teledermatology in which a total body skin examination is not performed by a competent practitioner – cannot be considered equivalent to a traditional
consultation and, if adopted uncritically, without system change, will likely lead to melanomas being missed.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)689-692
JournalActa Dermato-Venereologica
Volume93
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2013

Keywords

  • melanoma
  • skin cancer
  • screening
  • tele-dermatology
  • total body skin examination

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Importance of a Full Clinical Examination: Assessment of Index Lesions Referred to a Skin Cancer Clinic Without a Total Body Skin Examination Would Miss One in Three Melanomas'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this