The importance of clinical importance when determining the target difference in sample size calculations

Richard A Parker*, Jonathan A Cook

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract / Description of output

Recently it was argued that clinically important differences should play no role in sample size calculations. Instead, it was proposed that sample size calculations should focus on setting realistic estimates of treatment benefit. We disagree, and argue in this article that considering the importance of a target difference is necessary in the context of randomised controlled trials of effectiveness, particularly definitive Phase III trials. Ignoring clinical importance could have serious ethical and practical consequences.
Original languageEnglish
Article number495
Number of pages5
JournalTrials
Volume24
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 4 Aug 2023

Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)

  • Clinical trial
  • RCT
  • Power
  • Effect size
  • Assumed benefit
  • clinically relevant difference
  • minimum important difference
  • target difference

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The importance of clinical importance when determining the target difference in sample size calculations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this