TY - GEN
T1 - The influence of adversarial training on turbulence closure modeling
AU - Nista, L.
AU - Schumann, C.
AU - Scialabba, G.
AU - Grenga, T.
AU - Pitsch, H.
AU - Attili, A.
N1 - Funding Information:
The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Center of Excellence in Combustion (CoEC) project, grant agreement no. 952181. The authors gratefully acknowledge the computing resources from the DEEP-EST project, which received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the grant agreement no. 754304 and the computing resources granted by RWTH Aachen University under project rwth0658. We thank Mr. Rocco Sedona for the support in the porting of the application to DEEP-EST.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc, AIAA. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/12/29
Y1 - 2021/12/29
N2 - Over the last years, fundamental advancements in deep learning frameworks combined with the availability of large highly-resolved datasets, as well as the exponential improvement in computer hardware performance have shown great promise to move beyond classical equation-based models for the turbulence closure. Deep convolutional neural networks (CNN) can be used to super-resolve low-resolution simulations, thus they become attractive for large eddy simulation subfilter-scale modeling. However, these models often lack generalization capabilities and cannot guarantee fields with high-wavenumber details. To tackle those problems, the use of generative adversarial networks (GAN), which are composed of two competing neural networks (a generator and a discriminator) has been proposed. Despite the remarkable performance of GAN in single-image super-reconstruction, its application in turbulence modeling applications is relatively unexplored. In this work, the contribution of adversarial training is assessed by comparing two types of deep neural networks: a supervised CNN-type model and a semi-supervised GAN-based model. This study demonstrates the ability of the GAN architecture to produce high-quality super-reconstructed fields compared to standard deep convolutional networks, enhancing subgrid physical structures. The prolonged adversarial training leads to extracting underlying small-dimensional features in a semi-supervised manner and, consequently, improved turbulence statistics. Finally, it is shown that the propensity of the GAN training to run into convergence oscillations can be limited by a proper selection of the learning rate for both generator and discriminator.
AB - Over the last years, fundamental advancements in deep learning frameworks combined with the availability of large highly-resolved datasets, as well as the exponential improvement in computer hardware performance have shown great promise to move beyond classical equation-based models for the turbulence closure. Deep convolutional neural networks (CNN) can be used to super-resolve low-resolution simulations, thus they become attractive for large eddy simulation subfilter-scale modeling. However, these models often lack generalization capabilities and cannot guarantee fields with high-wavenumber details. To tackle those problems, the use of generative adversarial networks (GAN), which are composed of two competing neural networks (a generator and a discriminator) has been proposed. Despite the remarkable performance of GAN in single-image super-reconstruction, its application in turbulence modeling applications is relatively unexplored. In this work, the contribution of adversarial training is assessed by comparing two types of deep neural networks: a supervised CNN-type model and a semi-supervised GAN-based model. This study demonstrates the ability of the GAN architecture to produce high-quality super-reconstructed fields compared to standard deep convolutional networks, enhancing subgrid physical structures. The prolonged adversarial training leads to extracting underlying small-dimensional features in a semi-supervised manner and, consequently, improved turbulence statistics. Finally, it is shown that the propensity of the GAN training to run into convergence oscillations can be limited by a proper selection of the learning rate for both generator and discriminator.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85122565178&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://publications.rwth-aachen.de/record/837941
U2 - 10.2514/6.2022-0185
DO - 10.2514/6.2022-0185
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85122565178
SN - 9781624106316
T3 - AIAA Science and Technology Forum and Exposition, AIAA SciTech Forum 2022
BT - AIAA SciTech Forum 2022
PB - American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc. (AIAA)
T2 - AIAA Science and Technology Forum and Exposition, AIAA SciTech Forum 2022
Y2 - 3 January 2022 through 7 January 2022
ER -