The local provision of restorative justice in Scotland: An exploratory empirical study

Giuseppe Maglione, Jamie Buchan, Laura Robertson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract / Description of output

This article presents the results of the first empirical qualitative research on the provision of restorative justice (RJ) in Scotland, based on interviews with 14 practitioners. In Scotland, RJ has attracted the attention of penal reformers and practitioners since the late 1980s, offering an alternative to criminal justice practices based on retribution and/or rehabilitation whilst promising to reduce reoffending and heal people harmed by crime. In 2017, the Scottish Government has fully recognized the existence of RJ by issuing the first national ‘Guidance’ for the delivery of this process, followed by an ambitious ‘Action Plan’. In spite of such a long-lasting interest and recent policy recognition, there is a lack of knowledge regarding the organization and actual delivery of RJ in Scotland. In fact, research on this subject is scant, anecdotal and dated. This article addresses this knowledge gap by presenting original data on the provision of RJ within Scottish local authorities. The findings show similar understandings of RJ, context-specific organizational models and common systemic challenges characterizing RJ providers, generating evidence to critically assess recent Scottish policy on RJ, whilst drawing implications with relevance for the development of RJ across Europe.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages24
JournalEuropean Journal on Criminal Policy and Research
Early online date27 Nov 2020
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 27 Nov 2020
Externally publishedYes

Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)

  • restorative justice
  • community justice
  • qualitative interviews
  • system-level challenges
  • Scotland


Dive into the research topics of 'The local provision of restorative justice in Scotland: An exploratory empirical study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this