Abstract
This study brings together for the first time all the evidence we have for lost ninth-century manuscript from Murbach of the Historia Augusta. When this evidence is rigourously examined, it becomes clear that the Murbacensis represents a very different, and often superior, text to that found in the main ninth-century witness, Pal. lat. 899.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | Exemplaria Classica |
Volume | 24 |
Early online date | 9 Dec 2020 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 9 Dec 2020 |
Keywords
- Historia Augusta
- textual criticism
- palaeography