The noncitizen penalty in U.S. federal courts: Differences in punishment by region of citizenship

Allison Kurpiel*, Anthony Albanese

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract / Description of output

Previous literature has found that noncitizens are punished in U.S. federal courts more severely than U.S. citizens for offenses that are legally equivalent, though less is known about variation in the noncitizen effect depending on the defendant’s nation of citizenship. Using United States Sentencing Commission (USSC) federal courts data from 2018 to 2020, we analyze group differences in the noncitizen penalty across regions of national origin. We draw from literature on group threat and the focal concerns perspective to guide our expectations. We find that noncitizens from all regions except Asia and North/West Europe have higher odds of being incarcerated compared with U.S. citizens, and noncitizens from Mexico, Central and South America, the Caribbean, and Africa receive longer sentence lengths than U.S. citizens. Implications concerning the theoretical mechanisms relevant to the noncitizen penalty are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)820-843
Number of pages24
JournalSociological Perspectives
Volume66
Issue number5
Early online date17 Jun 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2023

Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)

  • citizenship
  • courts
  • group threat
  • immigration
  • sentencing

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The noncitizen penalty in U.S. federal courts: Differences in punishment by region of citizenship'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this