Projects per year
Abstract
This article traces the impact of Wolf Biermann’s expatriation on the Deutsches Theater and its production of "Michael Kohlhaas", adapted by the director Adolf Dresen. It aims to establish a differentiated picture of the political positions and responses within East Berlin’s theatre community, to explore context-specific readings of "Kohlhaas", and to show how the Deutsches Theater dealt with an unexpectedly controversial text under the institutional pressures of state censorship.
The rehearsals for "Kohlhaas" ran in parallel with the SED’s disciplinary procedures against Dresen, who refused to withdraw his protest against Biermann’s expatriation. Yet whilst he and his production team discussed the text’s new topical relevance in rehearsals, they kept their disagreements backstage. This resulted in a production predicated on non-communication: "Kohlhaas" was presented as a blank canvas onto which spectators could project their own interpretations. While local SED officials cautiously welcomed the production, the Stasi denounced it; and Western reviewers argued over whether it marked a success or failure for critical GDR theatre. The GDR authorities, like Western critics, focused on the question of whether Kohlhaas represented Biermann, but Dresen’s papers reveal another possible reading: he himself had come to identify with Kohlhaas. Quoting Kohlhaas’s defiant words to Luther, Dresen voted for his exclusion from the SED and applied to leave the GDR. Yet unlike Kohlhaas and Biermann, he strove to minimize the public impact of his political stand.
The rehearsals for "Kohlhaas" ran in parallel with the SED’s disciplinary procedures against Dresen, who refused to withdraw his protest against Biermann’s expatriation. Yet whilst he and his production team discussed the text’s new topical relevance in rehearsals, they kept their disagreements backstage. This resulted in a production predicated on non-communication: "Kohlhaas" was presented as a blank canvas onto which spectators could project their own interpretations. While local SED officials cautiously welcomed the production, the Stasi denounced it; and Western reviewers argued over whether it marked a success or failure for critical GDR theatre. The GDR authorities, like Western critics, focused on the question of whether Kohlhaas represented Biermann, but Dresen’s papers reveal another possible reading: he himself had come to identify with Kohlhaas. Quoting Kohlhaas’s defiant words to Luther, Dresen voted for his exclusion from the SED and applied to leave the GDR. Yet unlike Kohlhaas and Biermann, he strove to minimize the public impact of his political stand.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Cultural Impact in the German Context |
Subtitle of host publication | Studies in Transmission, Reception and Influence |
Editors | Rebecca Braun, Lyn Marven |
Place of Publication | Rochester, NY |
Publisher | Camden House |
Pages | 243-59 |
Number of pages | 17 |
ISBN (Print) | 978-1-57113-430-1 |
Publication status | Published - 2010 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The politics of cultural impact: "Michael Kohlhaas" at the Deutsches Theater'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Projects
- 2 Finished
-
-
Dramatic Conflicts: Theatre and censorship in the German Democratic Republic 1961-1989
16/07/06 → 30/07/08
Project: Research
Activities
-
Who's Watching Who? Theatre and Surveillance
Laura Bradley (Contributor), Susan Kemp (Contributor), Camilla Baier (Curator) & Lauren Clarke (Curator)
18 Nov 2018Activity: Participating in or organising an event types › Public Engagement – Festival/Exhibition
-
Screening of 'Writing Ensemble'
Laura Bradley (Speaker) & Susan Kemp (Speaker)
20 Feb 2018Activity: Participating in or organising an event types › Public Engagement – Public lecture/debate/seminar
-
Rehearsed reading of ENSEMBLE by Peter Arnott (draft 3)
Laura Bradley (Organiser)
26 Sept 2015Activity: Participating in or organising an event types › Public Engagement – Public lecture/debate/seminar