The Risk stratification Of Syncope in the Emergency department (ROSE) pilot study: a comparison of existing syncope guidelines

Matthew J Reed, David E Newby, Andrew J Coull, Keith G Jacques, Robin J Prescott, Alasdair J Gray

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract / Description of output

This study was conducted as a feasibility pilot for the Risk stratification Of Syncope in the Emergency department (ROSE) study. The secondary aim was to compare the performance of our existing emergency department (ED) guidelines with existing clinical decision rules (Osservatorio Epidemiologico sulla Sincope nel Lazio (OESIL) Score and San Francisco Syncope Rule; SFSR) at predicting short-term (1 week and 1 month) and medium-term (3 months) serious outcomes for patients with syncope presenting to the ED.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)270-5
Number of pages6
JournalEmergency Medicine Journal
Volume24
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2007

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Risk stratification Of Syncope in the Emergency department (ROSE) pilot study: a comparison of existing syncope guidelines'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this