Abstract / Description of output
We argue that, although syntax is not directly involved in the formation of
compounds themselves, competition between the syntactic and morphological modules of
grammar (Ackema and Neeleman 2001, 2004) has a decisive influence on compounding.
This is because this type of competition has the effect that certain, grammatically possible,
compounds will not surface in a language. This is why synthetic compounds can be based on
root compounds that do not themselves surface. We argue that, if the morphology of a
language really does not allow for the relevant type of root compound to be formed, then the
associated synthetic compounds are ruled out just as well. The fate of synthetic compounds
during the development of Saramaccan (and some other creole languages) is shown to
provide clear evidence for this hypothesis.
compounds themselves, competition between the syntactic and morphological modules of
grammar (Ackema and Neeleman 2001, 2004) has a decisive influence on compounding.
This is because this type of competition has the effect that certain, grammatically possible,
compounds will not surface in a language. This is why synthetic compounds can be based on
root compounds that do not themselves surface. We argue that, if the morphology of a
language really does not allow for the relevant type of root compound to be formed, then the
associated synthetic compounds are ruled out just as well. The fate of synthetic compounds
during the development of Saramaccan (and some other creole languages) is shown to
provide clear evidence for this hypothesis.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Cross-Disciplinary Issues in Compounding |
Editors | Sergio Scalise, Irene Vogel |
Place of Publication | Amsterdam |
Publisher | John Benjamins |
Pages | 21-36 |
Number of pages | 16 |
ISBN (Print) | 978 90 272 4827 5 |
Publication status | Published - 2010 |
Publication series
Name | Current Issues in Linguistic Theory |
---|---|
Volume | 311 |