The Roles of Knowledge Ascriptions in Epistemic Assessment

Mikkel Gerken

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Knowledge norms of action are sometimes said to be motivated by the fact that they align with natural assessments of action in ordinary language. Competent and rational speakers normally use ‘knowledge’ and its cognates when they assess action. In contrast, competing accounts in terms of evidence, warrant or reliability do not straightforwardly align with ordinary language assessments of action. In response to this line of reasoning, I argue that a warrant account of action may explain the prominence of ‘knowledge’ in epistemic assessments better than the knowledge account. If this explanation is successful, it undermines a central rationale for the ‘knowledge first’ program in epistemology. Moreover, the explanation provides an insight into the social functions of knowledge ascriptions as well as a methodological lesson about the relationship between folk epistemology and epistemological theorizing.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)141-161
Number of pages21
JournalEuropean Journal of Philosophy
Volume23
Issue number1
Early online date22 Apr 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2015

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Roles of Knowledge Ascriptions in Epistemic Assessment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this