Projects per year
Abstract / Description of output
This paper explores how a conception of the rule of law (embodied in a variety of legal and political institutions) came to affirm itself in the world of the ancient Greek city states. It argues that such a conception, formulated in opposition to the arbitrary rule of man, was to a large extent consistent with modern ideas of the rule of law as a constraint to political power, and to their Fullerian requirements of formal legality, as well as to requirements of due process. Section 2 analyses how this ideal was formulated in the Archaic period, and how it became a key feature of Greek identity. Section 3 argues that in the fifth and fourth centuries BCE it came to be used as the measure of the legitimacy of Greek political systems: democracy and oligarchy, as they engaged in an ideological battle, were judged as legitimate (and desirable) or illegitimate (and undesirable) on the basis of their conformity with a shared ideal of the rule of law. Then as now, to quote Tamanaha, ‘the rule of law’ was ‘an accepted measure worldwide of government legitimacy’.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 211-236 |
Journal | Hague Journal on the Rule of Law |
Volume | 9 |
Issue number | 2 |
Early online date | 11 May 2017 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Oct 2017 |
Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)
- Ancient Greece
- democracy
- Athens
- oligarchy
- tyranny
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The rule of law as the measure of political legitimacy in the Greek city states'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Projects
- 1 Finished