Abstract
This article argues that ninth-century advocates in the Frankish world deserve more attention than they have received. Exploring some of the wealth of relevant evidence, it reviews and critiques both current historiographical approaches to the issue. Instead of considering Carolingian advocates as largely a by-product of the ecclesiastical immunity, or viewing advocacy as a Trojan horse for a subsequent establishment of lordship over monasteries, the article proposes a reading of ninth-century advocacy as intimately linked with wider Carolingian reform, particularly an interest in promoting formal judicial procedure.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 186-206 |
Number of pages | 21 |
Journal | Early Medieval Europe |
Volume | 17 |
Issue number | 2 |
Early online date | 16 Apr 2009 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - May 2009 |