Abstract
As Plato might have said, but didn't, all soul is metaphor. This paper explores the implications of this in the tripartite model of the soul as deployed in the account of the deviant personality types in Republic 8 and 9. The levels of the hierarchy and the stages of degeneration from the ideal make frequent use of personification. Agency, however, is not attributed only to the εἴδη of the ψυχή, but also to the individual and to his desires. Interaction takes place between the individual and the εἴδη of his ψυχή, but also between the individual and his desires, as well as between desire and desire, and between the εἴδη of the ψυχή. There is interaction between one individual and another, but also between one individual and various personified elements of another’s personality. Since personification characterizes the model at all levels, it makes no sense to ask what the ἐπιθυμητικόν (for example) can ‘really’ do; it is only in so far as it is personified that it can ‘do’ anything. The tenor of the metaphor is not some non-metaphorical or less metaphorical version of the tripartite soul, but simply the person.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Plato and the Power of Images |
| Editors | P. Destrée , R.G. Edmunds |
| Place of Publication | Leiden |
| Publisher | Brill Academic Publishers |
| Publication status | Published - 2017 |
| Event | Plato and the power of images - Bryn Mawr College, Bryn Mawr , United States Duration: 11 Oct 2013 → 12 Oct 2013 |
Conference
| Conference | Plato and the power of images |
|---|---|
| Country/Territory | United States |
| City | Bryn Mawr |
| Period | 11/10/13 → 12/10/13 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The tripartite soul as metaphor'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver