The trouble with thresholds: Rationing as a rational choice in child and family social work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract / Description of output

The financial crisis of 2008 has led central governments in industrialised nations to seek to reduce public expenditure at the same time that demands upon the welfare state are increasing. Using the example of statutory social work with children and families in England, this article explores whether the concept of rationing might be a more useful way of describing practices at the front line that seek to meet the objectives of policy makers, while also being financially responsible. In doing so the article challenges social work to see austerity as less of a descriptor of the straightened financial times we live in, but rather as an ideology that is seeking to reshape the very nature of the welfare state, and to push responsibility for dealing with the consequences of these decisions away from politicians and policy makers onto front line staff.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)458-466
Number of pages9
JournalChild & Family Social Work
Volume24
Issue number4
Early online date11 Dec 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2019

Keywords / Materials (for Non-textual outputs)

  • thresholds
  • rationing
  • decision making
  • child welfare

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The trouble with thresholds: Rationing as a rational choice in child and family social work'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this